Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31165875›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2020

Two-Phase, Generalized Case-Control Designs for the Study of Quantitative Longitudinal Outcomes.

Jonathan S Schildcrout, Sebastien Haneuse, Ran Tao, Leila R Zelnick, Enrique F Schisterman, Shawn P Garbett, Nathaniel D Mercaldo, Paul J Rathouz, Patrick J Heagerty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modern sources of controls in case-control studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonathan S SchildcroutDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sebastien HaneuseDepartment of Biostatistics, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ran TaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Leila R ZelnickDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Enrique F SchistermanDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
Shawn P GarbettDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Nathaniel D MercaldoDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Paul J RathouzDepartment of Population Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
Patrick J HeagertyDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Outcome Dependent Sampling Studies of Longitudinal Data: Design and AnalysisR01HL094786 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jonathan Scott Schildcrout · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
ROC Curve MethodologyZIAHD008761 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SCHISTERMAN, ENRIQUE F. · 2009 to 2021
$2.1M
Statistical Methods for Longitudinal StudiesR01HL072966 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HEAGERTY, PATRICK J · 2003 to 2014
$1.9M
EARLY INTERVENTION/CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASEN01HR046002 · HR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CONNETT, JOHN E · 1985 to 1998
–
NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HR046002NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL072966NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a general class of 2-phase epidemiologic study designs for quantitative, longitudinal data that are useful when phase 1 longitudinal outcome and covariate data are available but data on the exposure (e.g., a biomarker) can only be collected on a subset of subjects during phase 2. To conduct a study using a design in the class, one first summarizes the longitudinal outcomes by fitting a simple linear regression of the response on a time-varying covariate for each subject. Sampling strata are defined by splitting the estimated regression intercept or slope distributions into distinct (low, medium, and high) regions. Stratified sampling is then conducted from strata defined by the intercepts, by the slopes, or from a mixture. In general, samples selected with extreme intercept values will yield low variances for associations of time-fixed exposures with the outcome and samples enriched with extreme slope values will yield low variances for associations of time-varying exposures with the outcome (including interactions with time-varying exposures). We describe ascertainment-corrected maximum likelihood and multiple-imputation estimation procedures that permit valid and efficient inferences. We embed all methodological developments within the framework of conducting a substudy that seeks to examine genetic associations with lung function among continuous smokers in the Lung Health Study (United States and Canada, 1986-1994).

Indexed as

Epidemiologic Research DesignModels, StatisticalCase-Control StudiesHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesOutcome Assessment, Health CareSampling Studiesascertainment-corrected likelihoodcase-control studiesconditional likelihoodlinear mixed modelslongitudinal datamultiple imputationoutcome-dependent samplingresponse-selective sampling

Identifiers

PMID31165875
PMCPMC7298772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.