ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2020
Two-Phase, Generalized Case-Control Designs for the Study of Quantitative Longitudinal Outcomes.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modern sources of controls in case-control studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Estimating weighted quantile treatment effects with missing outcome data by double sampling.Biometrics · 2025Article
- Efficient risk-based collection of biospecimens in cohort studies: designing a prospective study of diagnostic performance for multicancer detection tests.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- A flexible matching strategy for matched nested case-control studies.Annals of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Two-phase stratified sampling and analysis for predicting binary outcomes.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Generalized case-control sampling under generalized linear models.Biometrics · 2023Article
- Conducting density-sampled case-control studies using survey data with complex sampling designs: A simulation study.Annals of epidemiology · 2022Article
- Optimal allocation in stratified cluster-based outcome-dependent sampling designs.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a general class of 2-phase epidemiologic study designs for quantitative, longitudinal data that are useful when phase 1 longitudinal outcome and covariate data are available but data on the exposure (e.g., a biomarker) can only be collected on a subset of subjects during phase 2. To conduct a study using a design in the class, one first summarizes the longitudinal outcomes by fitting a simple linear regression of the response on a time-varying covariate for each subject. Sampling strata are defined by splitting the estimated regression intercept or slope distributions into distinct (low, medium, and high) regions. Stratified sampling is then conducted from strata defined by the intercepts, by the slopes, or from a mixture. In general, samples selected with extreme intercept values will yield low variances for associations of time-fixed exposures with the outcome and samples enriched with extreme slope values will yield low variances for associations of time-varying exposures with the outcome (including interactions with time-varying exposures). We describe ascertainment-corrected maximum likelihood and multiple-imputation estimation procedures that permit valid and efficient inferences. We embed all methodological developments within the framework of conducting a substudy that seeks to examine genetic associations with lung function among continuous smokers in the Lung Health Study (United States and Canada, 1986-1994).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.