Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31165776›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Pre-Operative Delta-MELD is an Independent Predictor of Higher Mortality following Liver Transplantation.

George Cholankeril, Andrew A Li, Brittany B Dennis, Chiranjeevi Gadiparthi, Donghee Kim, Alice E Toll, Benedict J Maliakkal, Sanjaya K Satapathy, Satheesh Nair, Aijaz Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. TIPS: indications, Contraindications, and Evaluation.Current gastroenterology reports · 2023
    Review
  3. Joint modeling of liver transplant candidates outperforms the model for end-stage liver disease: The effect of disease development over time on patient outcome.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

George CholankerilDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Andrew A LiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Brittany B DennisDepartment of Medicine, Saint George's Hospital, University of London, London, UK.
Chiranjeevi GadiparthiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Donghee KimDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alice E TollDepartment of Research, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA, USA.
Benedict J MaliakkalDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Sanjaya K SatapathyDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Satheesh NairDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Aijaz AhmedDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. aijazahmed@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical decompensation immediately prior to liver transplantation may affect post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes. Using the serial Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores recorded in the United Network for Organ Sharing national registry (2010-2017), we analyzed post-LT mortality among adult LT recipients based on the degree of fluctuation in MELD score during the 30-day period prior to LT surgery. Delta-MELD (D-MELD) was defined as recipient MELD score at LT minus lowest MELD score within the preceding 30 days. Impact of D-MELD as a continuous and categorical variable (D-MELD 0-4, 5-10, >10) on early, 30-day post-LT mortality was assessed. Overall, a total of 12,785 LT recipients were analyzed, of which 8,862 (67.9%) had a pre-operative D-MELD 0-4; 2,574 (20.1%) with a D-MELD 5-10; and 1,529 (12.0%) with a D-MELD > 10. One-point incremental increase in pre-operative D-MELD (adjusted HR, 1.07, 95% CI: 1.04-1.10) was associated with higher 30-day post-LT mortality. Moreover, pre-operative D-MELD > 10 was associated with nearly a two-fold increased risk for 30-day post-LT mortality (adjusted HR, 1.89, 95% CI: 1.30-2.77) compared to D-MELD 0-4. The increased risk of pre-LT mortality associated with severity of clinical decompensation assessed by the magnitude of pre-operative D-MELD persists in the early post-LT period.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleHepatitis CHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative PeriodProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRisk FactorsUnited StatesWaiting Lists

Identifiers

PMID31165776
PMCPMC6549161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.