Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31165662›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health.

Dharma N Bhatta, Stanton A Glantz

RetractedErratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Electronic Cigarette Use and the Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. E-Cigarette Health Harm Awareness and Discouragement: Implications for Health Communication.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dharma N Bhatta1 Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education University of California, San Francisco San Francisco CA.
Stanton A Glantz1 Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education University of California, San Francisco San Francisco CA.
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Training and Education p489-500P50CA180890 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GLANTZ, STANTON ARNOLD · 2013 to 2018
$20.5M
PROJECT 5: IMPACT OF CHANGING TOBACCO PRODUCT USE ON HEALTHCARE COSTS FOR GENERAL AND VULNERABLE POPULATIONSU54HL147127 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MAX, WENDY B · 2018 to 2022
$20.4M
Effect of Tobacco Advocacy at the State LevelR01DA043950 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI APOLLONIO, DOROTHY ELINOR · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180890NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL147127NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background E-cigarettes are popular for smoking cessation and as an alternative to combustible cigarettes. We assess the association between e-cigarette use and having had a myocardial infarction ( MI ) and whether reverse causality can explain the observed cross-sectional association between e-cigarette use and MI . Methods and Results Cross-sectional analysis of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Wave 1 for association between e-cigarette use and having had and MI . Longitudinal analysis of Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Waves 1 and 2 for reverse causality analysis. Logistic regression was performed to determine the associations between e-cigarette initiation and MI , adjusting for cigarette smoking, demographic and clinical variables. Every-day (adjusted odds ratio, 2.25, 95% CI : 1.23-4.11) and some-day (1.99, 95% CI : 1.11-3.58) e-cigarette use were independently associated with increased odds of having had an MI with a significant dose-response ( P<0.0005). Odds ratio for daily dual use of both products was 6.64 compared with a never cigarette smoker who never used e-cigarettes. Having had a myocardial infarction at Wave 1 did not predict e-cigarette use at Wave 2 ( P>0.62), suggesting that reverse causality cannot explain the cross-sectional association between e-cigarette use and MI observed at Wave 1. Conclusions Some-day and every-day e-cigarette use are associated with increased risk of having had a myocardial infarction, adjusted for combustible cigarette smoking. Effect of e-cigarettes are similar as conventional cigarette and dual use of e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes at the same time is risker than using either product alone.

Indexed as

e‐cigarettesepidemiologymyocardial infarctionsmoking

Identifiers

PMID31165662
PMCPMC6645634
OpenAlexW2948553127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.