Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31165422›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020

Increasing Undergraduate Exposure to Oncology: the Role of Oncology Interest Groups.

Marissa Sherwood, Danielle Rioux, Rosalinda Knight, Max LeBlanc, Taylor Betsch, Meredith Giuliani, Amanda Caissie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Re-stitching the Cancer Journey in Undergraduate Training: from Fragmented Encounters to Continuity of Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  4. Bridging the Gap: Addressing the Disparity Between Expectations and Practical Training in Oncology During Medical School.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  5. Improving Medical Education in Oncology: Enhancing Students' Understanding of Cancer Treatments Through Multidisciplinary Clinical Rotations.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  6. Lifestyle Medicine Interest Group (LMIG) Events Analysis.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Importance of an Oncology Interest Group in Medical School: Experience from a Developing Country.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Review
  8. Assessment of a Medical Student-Run Multidisciplinary Oncology Shadowing Program.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Medical Student Leadership in the Student Oncology Society: Evaluation of a Student-Run Interest Group.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Mapping the Current State of Canadian Medical School Oncology Interest Groups.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marissa SherwoodDalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada. Marissa.sherwood@dal.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8522-0982
Danielle RiouxDalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.
Rosalinda KnightDalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.
Max LeBlancDalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.
Taylor BetschDalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.
Meredith GiulianiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Amanda CaissieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Saint John, NB, Canada.
Saint John Regional Hospital · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes a medical school oncology interest group (OIG) and assesses its influence on student perceptions of oncology, interest in pursuing oncology as a career, and comfort levels with oncology topics such as breaking bad news. From 2015 to 2017, the OIG annual event took place at a satellite campus of a larger Canadian undergraduate medical school. The event provided a question and answer period with a panel of physicians from multiple oncology specialties-discussions focused around lifestyle, training, clinical work, lifestyle, and career focus. Small physician-led groups taught breaking bad news using the SPIKES framework. The interest group also provided a mentoring and networking opportunity to interested students. Pre- and post-event surveys were distributed to students and physicians. For three consecutive years, the student-run, and physician-mentored OIG successfully recruited student and physician participants, providing a clinical skill teaching session as well as mentorship opportunities to students. Pre-event surveys found that only 20% of students believed their current curriculum was adequate as it relates to oncology education. In pre-session, 13% (6/45) of students indicated comfort with the skill of breaking bad news, compared with that in post-session with 81% (34/42) of students feeling comfortable. When asked "How likely are you to pursue a future elective opportunity in oncology?" 49% (20/41) of students indicated "likely" as their response in the pre-session. This response increased post-session to 70% (28/40). The event highlighted the potential for OIGs to increase student interest in pursuing oncology electives and student-perceived comfort with breaking bad news. OIGs are important in promoting interest in the field of oncology and in improving confidence in breaking bad news. This medical student-created, run and maintained oncology interest group supplemented standard curriculum by providing relevant educational and mentorship opportunities to students. This study highlights the feasibility of implementing a self-sustaining medical school oncology interest group and its potential to positively impact student learning and interest in oncology.

Indexed as

CanadaCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateGroup ProcessesHumansMedical OncologyMentorsSocietiesStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesBreaking bad newsEducationOncology

Identifiers

PMID31165422
OpenAlexW2948169948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.