SynthesisClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020
The efficacy and safety of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF)-based induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trial
- The Acute Toxicities and Efficacy of Concurrent Chemotherapy With Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin, or Docetaxel, or Cisplatin and Helical Tomotherapy in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Single-Center Phase II Trial.Technology in cancer research & treatmentTrial
- Review
- Low-Compared with High-Dose Regimen of Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.South Asian journal of cancer · 2025Review
- Tislelizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective study.Translational oncology · 2024Article
- Impact of induction chemotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics for the prediction of progression-free survival in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The Association of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism rs13181 in ERCC2 with Risk and Prognosis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in an Endemic Chinese Population.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Colonic perforation in a nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient treated with fluorouracil: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Epidemiological Profile and Clinicopathological, Therapeutic, and Prognostic Characteristics of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Northern Morocco.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn recent years, docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF)-based induction chemotherapy (IC) has been widely applied in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). However, it remains unclear whether TPF is the ideal IC regimen. Thus, we carried out a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of TPF-based IC plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone or double-drug-based IC plus CCRT for LA-NPC.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception until December 2018. After rigorous screening of all relevant studies that reported the use of TPF-based IC followed by CCRT for patients with LA-NPC, eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for design and quality. Among them, three articles were classified as having a high risk of bias and were excluded from the meta-analysis. The outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) and incidence of adverse events, were pooled with the use of hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR). Heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were also carried out.
resultsFive trials involving 4223 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to CCRT alone, TPF-based IC plus CCRT significantly improved OS (HR 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.84, P = 0.006), PFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.88, P = 0.006), LRFFS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.94, P = 0.03), and DMFS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88, P = 0.01). Moreover, compared to double-drug-based IC plus CCRT, OS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.87, P = 0.0004), PFS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.88, P = 0.0001) and LRFFS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92, P = 0.006) were also significantly improved by TPF-based IC plus CCRT. Notably, TPF-based IC plus CCRT mainly led to an increased risk of hematologic toxicities, such as leucopenia (OR = 3.20, 95% CI 2.13-4.81, P < 0.0001) and neutropenia (OR = 3.84, 95% CI 0.66-22.36, P = 0.13). However, these were uncomplicated and manageable with growth factor support.
conclusionsCompared to CCRT alone or double-drug-based IC plus CCRT, TPF-based IC plus CCRT results in better survival outcomes with manageable toxicities. Thus, it is reasonable to recommend the addition of TPF-based IC to CCRT as an excellent choice for patients with LA-NPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31165410What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.