ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2019
Indications for Single-Operator Cholangioscopy and Pancreatoscopy: an Expert Review.
Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: Multimodal treatment for two unresectable intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the bile duct and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- PERcutaneous transhepatic CHOLangioscopy using a new single-operator short cholangioscope (PERCHOL): European feasibility study.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2024Observational
- Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the bile duct with choledochoduodenal fistula: a case report and literature review.AME case reports · 2024Article
- Novel pancreatoscope improves diagnostic yield of visual findings for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.Endoscopy · 2023Article
- Review
- Endoscopic salvage extraction of a fish bone impacted in a liver abscess by extra-anatomic cholangioscopy.Endoscopy · 2022Article
- The Diagnostic Dilemma of Malignant Biliary Strictures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Role of Peroral Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewDirect endoscopic visualization of the biliary and pancreatic ducts by single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) and pancreatoscopy (SOP) is an expanding technique with an increasing number of indications. This review provides technical tips and tricks and a literature update on the usefulness of SOC and SOP in clinical practice. RECENT
findingsSOC has shown a 91.3% and 87.3% diagnostic procedural success in indeterminate strictures and difficult stones respectively, with a 9.4%-16.4% complication rate. Although the interpretation of the images suspected for malignancy can be challenging, new classifications based in mucosal and vascular patterns as well as better devices are in development. A higher sensitivity has been associated to targeted biopsies, compared to brushing and blinded biopsies. Indeed, SOC has recently demonstrated a decrease in the number of procedures and costs when compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. This technique has also been reported for many other diagnostic and therapeutic indications, such as cholangiocarcinoma staging and foreign body extraction. Similarly, diagnostic and therapeutic SOP in indeterminate strictures or pancreatic stones, and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, has been successfully reported. Research to date supports the use of cholangioscopy as a complementary examination in patients with indeterminate strictures, difficult stones and specific situations. In a near future, there will probably be new established indications, a better understanding of the imaging findings and a place of SOC/SOP as first line in selected scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31165382What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.