SynthesisDer Nervenarzt2019
[Open doors in psychiatric hospitals : An overview of empirical findings].
Synthesis in Der Nervenarzt, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and risk factors for seclusion and restraint: results of a retrospective analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- [Implementation of an Open Door Policy on Two Acute Care Units].Psychiatrische Praxis · 2024Article
- Treatment with Soteria-elements in acute psychiatry-Effectiveness for acutely ill and voluntarily treated patients.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- The association between the admission to wards with open- vs. closed-door policy and the use of coercive measures.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Open Doors by Fair Means: a quasi-experimental controlled study on the effects of an open-door policy on acute psychiatric wards.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Article
- Opportunities, risks and challenges in global mental health and population neuroscience: a case of Sino-German cooperation.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2021Review
- Evaluation of coercive measures in different psychiatric hospitals: the impact of institutional characteristics.BMC psychiatry · 2021Observational
- Aggressive incidents in psychiatric hospitals on heat days.BJPsych open · 2021Article
- From Wish to Reality: Soteria in Regular Care-Proof of Effectiveness of the Implementation of Soteria Elements in Acute Psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- [German S3 guidelines on avoidance of coercion: prevention and therapy of aggressive behavior in adults].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, it is a topic of debate whether psychiatric hospitals can and should be managed with a full open door policy. The revised legislation of public law for involuntary commitment explicitly allows or even encourages such practice in several German federal states. In parts of Austria, open doors are required for legal reasons. A systematic literature search was conducted for articles providing empirical data related to this issue.
methodLiterature search in PubMed augmented by a manual search in references of retrieved papers and reviews with similar objectives.
resultsA total of 26 articles reporting empirical data could be identified. Most of these articles came from Germany or Switzerland. The majority were published within the past 5 years. The definition of "open doors" ranged from an only vaguely defined open door policy up to explicit set time periods with open doors. Some studies reported a decrease in coercive interventions. No study reported any associated adverse events resulting from open doors in psychiatric wards. DISCUSSION: Generally, all studies had methodological weaknesses. Prospective randomized controlled studies or quasi-experimental studies are missing in the context of European healthcare systems. The risk of bias was considerable in most studies. A final conclusion regarding the possible extent of psychiatry with open doors and the associated risks is currently not possible. There is an urgent need for future high-quality prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31165212What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.