Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31165207›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2019

Gender differences in the behavioral and subjective effects of methamphetamine in healthy humans.

Leah M Mayo, Elisabeth Paul, Jessica DeArcangelis, Kathryne Van Hedger, Harriet de Wit

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Ketamine enhancement of dexmedetomidine attenuation of methamphetamine-induced agitation in rats.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Leah M MayoCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. leah.mayo@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0645-4869
Elisabeth PaulCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Jessica DeArcangelisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Kathryne Van HedgerBrain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Linköping University · SEUniversity of Chicago · USWestern University · CA

Funding

Acquisition and persistence of drug cue conditioning in humans - Resubmission 01R01DA037011 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMethamphetamine (MA) use is steadily increasing and thus constitutes a major public health concern. Women seem to be particularly vulnerable to developing MA use disorder, as they initiate use at a younger age and transition more quickly to problematic use. Initial drug responses may predict subsequent use, but little information exists on potential gender differences in the acute effects of MA prior to dependence.

objectiveWe examined gender differences in the acute effects of MA on subjective mood and reward-related behavior in healthy, non-dependent humans.

methodsMen (n = 44) and women (n = 29) completed 4 sessions in which they received placebo or MA under double-blind conditions twice each. During peak drug effect, participants completed the monetary incentive delay task to assess reaction times to cues signaling potential monetary losses or gains, in an effort to determine if MA would potentiate reward-motivated behavior. Cardiovascular and subjective drug effects were assessed throughout sessions.

resultsOverall, participants responded more quickly to cues predicting incentivized trials, particularly large-magnitude incentives, than to cues predicting no incentive. MA produced faster reaction times in women, but not in men. MA produced typical stimulant-like subjective and cardiovascular effects in all participants, but subjective ratings of vigor and (reduced) sedation were greater in women than in men.

conclusionsWomen appear to be more sensitive to the psychomotor-related behavioral and subjective effects of MA. These findings provide initial insight into gender differences in acute effects of MA that may contribute to gender differences in problematic MA use.

Indexed as

RewardSex CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAffectAmphetamine-Related DisordersCentral Nervous System StimulantsCuesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMethamphetamineMotivationReaction TimeCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethamphetamineGender differencesMethamphetamineMonetary incentive delayPsychomotor activationSex differencesSubjective effects

Identifiers

PMID31165207
PMCPMC6695366
OpenAlexW2948605482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.