ArticleThe Analyst2019
Identification of neural stem and progenitor cell subpopulations using DC insulator-based dielectrophoresis.
Article in The Analyst, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dielectrophoresis reveals stimulus-induced remodeling of insulin granule subpopulations.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Quantifying and Minimizing the Variance of Gradient Insulator-Based Dielectrophoresis.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Dielectrophoresis Reveals Stimulus-Induced Remodeling of Insulin Granule Subpopulations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Microfluidic-based electrically driven particle manipulation techniques for biomedical applications.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Article
- Recent Advances in Dielectrophoretic Manipulation and Separation of Microparticles and Biological Cells.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Switching Separation Migration Order by Switching Electrokinetic Regime in Electrokinetic Microsystems.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Engineering Tissues of the Central Nervous System: Interfacing Conductive Biomaterials with Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Review
- The latest advances on nonlinear insulator-based electrokinetic microsystems under direct current and low-frequency alternating current fields: a review.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Review
- Particle trapping in electrically driven insulator-based microfluidics: Dielectrophoresis and induced-charge electrokinetics.Electrophoresis · 2021Review
- Microscale nonlinear electrokinetics for the analysis of cellular materials in clinical applications: a review.Mikrochimica acta · 2021Review
- Dielectrophoresis as a tool for electrophysiological characterization of stem cells.Biophysics reviews · 2020Review
- Determination of Dielectric Properties of Cells using AC Electrokinetic-based Microfluidic Platform: A Review of Recent Advances.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Differential Biophysical Behaviors of Closely Related Strains of Salmonella.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural stem and progenitor cells (NSPCs) are an extremely important group of cells that form the central nervous system during development and have the potential to repair damage in conditions such as stroke impairment, spinal cord injury and Parkinson's disease degradation. Current schemes for separation of NSPCs are inadequate due to the complexity and diversity of cells in the population and lack sufficient markers to distinguish diverse cell types. This study presents an unbiased high-resolution separation and characterization of NSPC subpopulations using direct current insulator-based dielectrophoresis (DC-iDEP). The properties of the cells were identified by the ratio of electrokinetic (EK) to dielectrophoretic (DEP) mobilities. The ratio factor of NSPCs showed more heterogeneity variance (SD = 3.4-3.9) than the controlled more homogeneous human embryonic kidney cells (SD = 1.1), supporting the presence of distinct subpopulations of cells in NSPC cultures. This measure reflected NSPC fate potential since the ratio factor distribution of more neurogenic populations of NSPCs was distinct from the distribution of astrogenic NSPC populations (confidence level >99.9%). The abundance of NSPCs captured with different ranges of ratio of EK to DEP mobilities also exhibit final fate trends consistent with established final fates of the chosen samples. DC-iDEP is a novel, label-free and non-destructive method for differentiating and characterizing, and potentially separating, neural stem cell subpopulations that differ in fate.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.