Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31165087›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2019

Risk of Corneal Graft Rejection After High-risk Keratoplasty Following Fine-needle Vessel Coagulation of Corneal Neovascularization Combined With Bevacizumab: A Pilot Study.

Deniz Hos, Viet Nhat Hung Le, Martin Hellmich, Sebastian Siebelmann, Sigrid Roters, Bjoern O Bachmann, Claus Cursiefen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Three-year follow-up of high-risk keratoplasty following fine-needle diathermy of corneal neovascularization combined with bevacizumab.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. [Pterygium: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Article
  11. [High-risk keratoplasty: the second (r)evolution in corneal surgery?]Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Article
  12. [Preconditioning of vascularized high-risk eyes using fine-needle diathermy and cross-linking].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. VEGF TrapTranslational vision science & technology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deniz HosDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Viet Nhat Hung LeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Martin HellmichInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sebastian SiebelmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sigrid RotersDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Bjoern O BachmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Claus CursiefenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorneal neovascularization is considered an important risk factor for allograft rejection after corneal transplantation (keratoplasty). Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative reduction of corneal neovascularization by fine-needle thermal cauterization combined with bevacizumab reduces the incidence of allograft rejection after subsequent high-risk keratoplasty.

methodsIn this interventional uncontrolled clinical pilot study, 31 eyes of 31 patients with corneal neovascularization in at least one corneal quadrant were included. All eyes were treated by fine-needle thermal cauterization of corneal vessels and subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab. Both treatments were repeated in the cases of visible reperfusion of occluded vessels. Afterward, penetrating keratoplasty was performed. When corneal neovascularization was present on the day of keratoplasty, additional vessel cauterization and injection of bevacizumab was performed. Patients were then followed to determine the incidence of allograft rejection.

resultsIn 18 eyes, vessel cauterization with bevacizumab injection was performed once before keratoplasty, whereas 13 eyes required retreatment before keratoplasty. No complications were observed. In 23 eyes, corneal neovascularization was present on the day of keratoplasty due to reperfusion of previously occluded vessels and simultaneous vessel cauterization with bevacizumab injection was performed. During follow-up (mean: 560 days; range: 59-1095 days), 4 graft rejection episodes in 4 eyes were observed. Estimated probabilities of corneal graft survival were 92.9% after 1 year (number at risk: 23), 78.4% after 2 years (number at risk: 9), and 78.4% after 3 years (number at risk: 3).

conclusionsOur initial results indicate that angioregressive treatment of pathological corneal vessels by fine-needle thermal cauterization combined with subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab before high-risk keratoplasty seems to result in graft survival rates comparable to survival rates seen in normal-risk keratoplasty. The findings of our pilot study warrant further controlled clinical trials with longer follow-up in a larger patient cohort.

Identifiers

PMID31165087
PMCPMC6511442
OpenAlexW2941994584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.