ArticleFrontiers in oncology2019
Validation of CyTOF Against Flow Cytometry for Immunological Studies and Monitoring of Human Cancer Clinical Trials.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medical Treatment of Lung Cancer: Can Immune Cells Predict the Response? A Systematic Review.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Pooled it
- Systemic longitudinal immune profiling identifies proliferating Treg cells as predictors of immunotherapy benefit: biomarker analysis from the phase 3 CONTINUUM and DIPPER trials.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Trial
- Single-cell immune signature for detecting early-stage HCC and early assessing anti-PD-1 immunotherapy efficacy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Trial
- Inhibitory receptor profiles for joint prediction of benefit and toxicity in immune checkpoint blockade.iScience · 2026Review
- Cell-based therapies of autoimmune diseases in the context of artificial intelligence development.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Quantitative Single-Cell Multielemental Analysis Using Metal-Loaded Microparticles: toward a Universal Quantification Workflow in Mass Cytometry.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of anti-MICA scFv affinities: Insights from three label-free biophysical methods and biological validation.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Heterogeneous immune cell composition in patients with combined immunodeficiency.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Inhibitory receptor states, immune homeostasis and the benefit-risk boundary of cancer checkpoint blockade.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Mass cytometric detection of homologous recombination proficiency in circulating tumor cells to predict chemoresistance of metastatic breast cancer patients.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Optimization of Cytometry by Time-of-Flight Staining for Peripheral Blood and Bone Marrow Samples.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2025Article
- Immunological biomarkers of aging.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2025Review
- Nanoplastics: Immune Impact, Detection, and Internalization after Human Blood Exposure by Single-Cell Mass Cytometry.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- A comprehensive analysis framework for evaluating commercial single-cell RNA sequencing technologies.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Dissecting immunophenotypic diversity in multiple myeloma via mass cytometry: a call for harmonized gating strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Application of mass cytometry to characterize hematopoietic stem cells in apheresis products of patients with hematological malignancies.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2024Article
- Robust Double Emulsions for Multicolor Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Phenotyping Tumor Heterogeneity through Proteogenomics: Study Models and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Mapping the single cell spatial immune landscapes of the melanoma microenvironment.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2024Review
- Machine learning integrative approaches to advance computational immunology.Genome medicine · 2024Review
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Flow cytometry is a widely applied approach for exploratory immune profiling and biomarker discovery in cancer and other diseases. However, flow cytometry is limited by the number of parameters that can be simultaneously analyzed, severely restricting its utility. Recently, the advent of mass cytometry (CyTOF) has enabled high dimensional and unbiased examination of the immune system, allowing simultaneous interrogation of a large number of parameters. This is important for deep interrogation of immune responses and particularly when sample sizes are limited (such as in tumors). Our goal was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of CyTOF against flow cytometry as a reliable analytic tool for human PBMC and tumor tissues for cancer clinical trials. We developed a 40+ parameter CyTOF panel and demonstrate that compared to flow cytometry, CyTOF yields analogous quantification of cell lineages in conjunction with markers of cell differentiation, function, activation, and exhaustion for use with fresh and viably frozen PBMC or tumor tissues. Further, we provide a protocol that enables reliable quantification by CyTOF down to low numbers of input human cells, an approach that is particularly important when cell numbers are limiting. Thus, we validate CyTOF as an accurate approach to perform high dimensional analysis in human tumor tissue and to utilize low cell numbers for subsequent immunologic studies and cancer clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.