ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2019
Long-term cardiovascular effects of vandetanib and pazopanib in normotensive rats.
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of solute carrier transporters in the biodistribution and toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Safety of VIAN-c4551, an Antiangiogenic Peptide Derived From Vasoinhibin.Drug development research · 2025Article
- Advances on the Experimental Research in Resistant Hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2024Review
- Alcohol suppresses cardiovascular diurnal variations in male normotensive rats: Role of reduced PER2 expression and CYP2E1 hyperactivity in the heart.Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Long-term cardiovascular effects of vandetanib and pazopanib in normotensive rats.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2019Article
- Monitoring haemodynamic changes in rodent models to better inform safety pharmacology: Novel insights fromJRSM cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vandetanib and pazopanib are clinically available, multi-targeted inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor tyrosine kinases. Short-term VEGF receptor inhibition is associated with hypertension in 15%-60% of patients, which may limit the use of these anticancer therapies over the longer term. To evaluate the longer-term cardiovascular implications of treatment, we investigated the "on"-treatment (21 days) and "off"-treatment (10 days) effects following daily administration of vandetanib, pazopanib, or vehicle, in conscious rats. Cardiovascular variables were monitored in unrestrained Sprague-Dawley rats instrumented with radiotelemetric devices. In Study 1, rats were randomly assigned to receive either daily intraperitoneal injections of vehicle (volume 0.5 mL; n = 5) or vandetanib 25 mg/kg/day (volume 0.5 mL; n = 6). In Study 2, rats received either vehicle (volume 0.5 mL; n = 4) or pazopanib 30 mg/kg/day (volume 0.5 mL; n = 7), dosed once every 24 hours for 21 days. All solutions were in 2% Tween, 5% propylene glycol in 0.9% saline solution. Vandetanib caused sustained increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) compared to baseline and vehicle. Vandetanib also significantly altered the circadian cycling of MAP, SBP, and DBP. Elevations in SBP were detectable 162 hours after the last dose of vandetanib. Pazopanib also caused increases in MAP, SBP, and DBP. However, compared to vandetanib, these increases were of slower onset and a smaller magnitude. These data suggest that the cardiovascular consequences of vandetanib and pazopanib treatment are sustained, even after prolonged cessation of drug treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.