ArticleMobile DNA2019
Characterization of a novel
Article in Mobile DNA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A near chromosome-level genome assembly of a ghost moth (Lepidoptera, Hepialidae).Scientific data · 2024Article
- Discovery of numerous novel Helitron-like elements in eukaryote genomes using HELIANO.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- HiTE: a fast and accurate dynamic boundary adjustment approach for full-length transposable element detection and annotation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A haplotype resolved chromosomal level avocado genome allows analysis of novel avocado genes.Horticulture research · 2022Article
- Characterization of Mariner transposons in seven species of Rhus gall aphids.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Diversity of short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) in lepidopteran insects and evidence of horizontal SINE transfer between baculovirus and lepidopteran hosts.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Satellite DNA-like repeats are dispersed throughout the genome of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas carried by Helentron non-autonomous mobile elements.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
resultsHere, we characterized a novel
conclusionsWe proposed a modified classification criteria of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.