ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2019
Interagency collaboration in primary mental health care: lessons from the Partners in Recovery program.
Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- "We Get Stuck in our Own Little Bubbles": How Community Mental Healthcare Professionals Acknowledge their Role in Interorganizational Collaboration.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Mapping mental health care services for children and youth population in Colombia's Pacific: potential for boundary spanning between community and formal services.International journal of mental health systems · 2024Article
- Examination of Adaptations to the Evidence Based Supported Employment Model: Individual Placement and Support.Administration and policy in mental health · 2023Article
- Interdisciplinary behavioral health provider perceptions of implementing the Collaborative Chronic Care Model: an i-PARIHS-guided qualitative study.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Barriers and Translational Solutions to Improving Community Living Outcomes among People of Color with Disabilities with Opioid Use Disorder: A Focus Group Perspective.Journal of rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Interagency Collaboration for Pediatric Autism Spectrum Disorder: Perspectives of Community-Based Providers.Journal of interprofessional education & practice · 2021Article
- Partners in Recovery: A Case Study of a National Support Coordination Program for People with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCollaborative care is a means of improving outcomes particularly for people with complex needs. The Partners in Recovery (PIR) program, established in Australia in 2012, provides care coordination to facilitate access to health and social support services for people with severe and persistent mental illness. Of the 48 PIR programs across Australia, 35 were led by Medicare Locals, the previous Australian regional primary health care organisation and nine involved Medicare Locals as partner organisations.
aimsTo identify features which enabled and hindered collaboration in PIR programs involving Medicare Locals and determine what can be learnt about delivering care to this population.
methodsData were collected from 50 interviews with senior staff at Medicare Locals and from eight focus groups with 51 mental health stakeholders in different Australian jurisdictions.
resultsSuccessful PIR programs were based upon effective collaboration. Collaboration was facilitated by dedicated funding, a shared understanding of PIR aims, joint planning, effective network management, mutual respect and effective communication. Collaboration was also enhanced by the local knowledge and population health planning functions of Medicare Locals. Jurisdictional boundaries and funding discontinuity were the primary barriers to collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.