ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
Slower and Less Variable Binocular Rivalry Rates in Patients With Bipolar Disorder, OCD, Major Depression, and Schizophrenia.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Eye-Tracking in Bipolar Disorder: A Methodology-Focused Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Perceiving the uncertain: predictive coding and individual differences in the dynamics of multistable perception.Cognitive processing · 2026Review
- Differential effects of attention and contrast on transition appearance during binocular rivalry.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Reduced neural suppression at occipital cortex in subthreshold depression.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Faster bi-stable visual switching in psychosis.Translational psychiatry · 2024Article
- Binocular rivalry under naturalistic geometry: Evidence from worlds simulated in virtual reality.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Bistable perception, precision and neuromodulation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Article
- Effects of interocular grouping demands on binocular rivalry.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Measuring the reliability of binocular rivalry.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- A multi-source behavioral and physiological recording system for cognitive assessment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Slowed alpha oscillations and percept formation in psychotic psychopathology.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Alternative female and male developmental trajectories in the dynamic balance of human visual perception.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Binocular Interactions in Glaucoma Patients With Nonoverlapping Visual Field Defects: Contrast Summation, Rivalry, and Phase Combination.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- Missing the forest because of the trees: slower alternations during binocular rivalry are associated with lower levels of visual detail during ongoing thought.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When two different images are presented to the two eyes dichoptically, observers usually experience a perceptual alternation between the two images. This phenomenon, known as binocular rivalry, has been used as a powerful tool to investigate mechanisms of visual awareness. It was also found that the rates of perceptual alternation are slower in patients with bipolar disorder than in healthy controls (Pettigrew and Miller, 1998; Miller et al., 2003). To investigate the broader clinical relevance of binocular rivalry in psychiatric disorders, we measured the perceptual alternation rates during rivalry in healthy controls (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.