ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Miniaturized Bidirectional Thermal Stimulation System Integrated With an Electrode Array for Recording Neural Activities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A comparative study assessing neural recording quality and inflammatory tissue response between stiff and flexible microelectrode arrays.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- A Drive-Vibration Integrated Piezoelectric Actuator for Flexible Electrode Implantation.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Robust minimally-invasive microfabricated stainless steel neural interfaces for high resolution recording.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Design, Fabrication, and Implantation of Invasive Microelectrode Arrays as in vivo Brain Machine Interfaces: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of manufacturing processes · 2024Article
- Implantable Electrochemical Microsensors for In Vivo Monitoring of Animal Physiological Information.Nano-micro letters · 2023Review
- Neuroprosthetics: from sensorimotor to cognitive disorders.Communications biology · 2023Review
- Advancing the interfacing performances of chronically implantable neural probes in the era of CMOS neuroelectronics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- 3D Printed Skull Cap and Benchtop Fabricated Microwire-Based Microelectrode Array for Custom Rat Brain Recordings.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Neural microprobe modelling and microfabrication for improved implantation and mechanical failure mitigation.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022Article
- Intracortical Microelectrode Array Unit Yield under Chronic Conditions: A Comparative Evaluation.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Open source silicon microprobes for high throughput neural recording.Journal of neural engineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Throughout the past decade, silicon-based neural probes have become a driving force in neural engineering. Such probes comprise sophisticated, integrated CMOS electronics which provide a large number of recording sites along slender probe shanks. Using such neural probes in a chronic setting often requires them to be mechanically anchored with respect to the skull. However, any relative motion between brain and implant causes recording instabilities and tissue responses such as glial scarring, thereby shielding recordable neurons from the recording sites integrated on the probe and thus decreasing the signal quality. In the current work, we present a comparison of results obtained using mechanically fixed and floating silicon neural probes chronically implanted into the cortex of a non-human primate. We demonstrate that the neural signal quality estimated by the quality of the spiking and local field potential (LFP) recordings over time is initially superior for the floating probe compared to the fixed device. Nonetheless, the skull-fixed probe also allowed long-term recording of multi-unit activity (MUA) and low frequency signals over several months, especially once pulsations of the brain were properly controlled.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.