ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2019
Validity and reproducibility of an incremental sit-to-stand exercise test in healthy middle-aged individuals.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliability and validity of sit-to-stand test protocols in patients with coronary artery disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] We aimed to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the incremental sit-to-stand exercise test for aerobic fitness evaluation in healthy middle-aged individuals. [Participants and Methods] Thirteen healthy middle-aged individuals randomly underwent the incremental sit-to-stand exercise and cycle ergometer tests, and the peak oxygen uptake was measured during both tests. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to assess the strength of the association between the peak oxygen uptake measured during the aforementioned tests. Intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals for peak oxygen uptake obtained during the first, second, and third incremental sit-to-stand exercise tests were used to determine the reproducibility of this test. [Results] The peak oxygen uptake measured during the incremental sit-to-stand exercise test was strongly associated with that measured during the cycle ergometer test (r=0.86). The intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) used to verify the association of the peak oxygen uptake between the first and the second incremental sit-to-stand exercise tests and between the second and third incremental sit-to-stand exercise tests were 0.92 (0.66-0.99) and 0.96 (0.82-0.99), respectively. [Conclusion] The incremental sit-to-stand exercise test is a valid and reproducible tool to evaluate aerobic fitness in healthy middle-aged individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.