Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31164734›Full record

ReviewSpinal cord2019

Monitoring spinal cord hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation: a review of the literature with special focus on the near-infrared spectroscopy technique.

Tahereh Rashnavadi, Andrew Macnab, Amanda Cheung, Armita Shadgan, Brian K Kwon, Babak Shadgan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Targeted Perfusion Therapy in Spinal Cord Trauma.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tahereh RashnavadiThe University of British Columbia, School of Biomedical Engineering, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.
Andrew MacnabInternational Collaborations on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Amanda CheungInternational Collaborations on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Armita ShadganDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Brian K KwonInternational Collaborations on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Babak ShadganThe University of British Columbia, School of Biomedical Engineering, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada. shadgan@mail.ubc.ca.
University of British Columbia · CAInternational Collaboration On Repair Discoveries · CASimon Fraser University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designReview.

objectivesClinical studies have shown that the hemodynamic management of patients following acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is an important aspect of their treatment for maintaining spinal cord (SC) perfusion and minimizing ischemic secondary injury to the SC. While this highlights the importance of ensuring adequate perfusion and oxygenation to the injured cord, a method for the real-time monitoring of these hemodynamic measures within the SC is lacking. The purpose of this review is to discuss current and potential methods for SC hemodynamic monitoring with special focus on applications using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).

methodsA literature search using the PubMed database. All peer-reviewed articles on NIRS monitoring of SC published from inception to May 2019 were reviewed.

resultsAmong 125 papers related to SC hemodynamics monitoring, 26 focused on direct/indirect NIRS monitoring of the SC. DISCUSSION: Current options for continuous, non-invasive, and real-time monitoring of SC hemodynamics are challenging and limited in scope. As a relatively new technique, NIRS has been successfully used for monitoring human cerebral hemodynamics, and has shown promising results in intraoperative assessment of SC hemodynamics in both human and animal models. Although utilizing NIRS to monitor the SC has been validated, applying NIRS clinically following SCI requires further development and investigation.

conclusionsNIRS is a promising non-invasive technique with the potential to provide real-time monitoring of relevant parameters in the SC. Currently, in its first developmental stages, further clinical and experimental studies are mandatory to ensure the validity and safety of NIRS techniques.

Indexed as

AnimalsHemodynamicsHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicOxygen ConsumptionSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredSpinal CordSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID31164734
OpenAlexW2948380211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.