Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31164608›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2019

A Loose Parts Randomized Controlled Trial to Promote Active Outdoor Play in Preschool-aged Children: Physical Literacy in the Early Years (PLEY) Project.

Natalie E Houser, Jane Cawley, Angela M Kolen, Daniel Rainham, Laurene Rehman, Joan Turner, Sara F L Kirk, Michelle R Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Scoping review of children's and youth's outdoor play publications in Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natalie E HouserCollege of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W9, Canada. natalie.houser@usask.ca.
Jane CawleyHealthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada. janescawley@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3293-9664
Angela M KolenDepartment of Human Kinetics, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS B2G 2W5, Canada. akolen@stfx.ca.
Daniel RainhamHealthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada. daniel.rainham@dal.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3932-2942
Laurene RehmanSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada. laurene.rehman@dal.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5231-1001
Joan TurnerChild and Youth Study, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS B3M 2J6, Canada. joan.turner@msvu.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2046-4892
Sara F L KirkHealthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada. sara.kirk@dal.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2146-4448
Michelle R StoneHealthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada. michelle.stone@dal.ca.

Funding

Lawson Foundation GRT 2015-67
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Physical Literacy in the Early Years (PLEY) intervention is a randomized mixed-methods controlled trial focused on embedding loose parts materials into the outdoor play spaces of regulated child care centres across Nova Scotia. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of the PLEY intervention versus standard regulated childcare practice in influencing thoughts and behaviors of children, parents, and educators.

methodsParticipating early child care centres (n = 19) were randomly assigned to intervention or control sites. Intervention sites received loose parts kits at the beginning of the project while control sites received kits upon project completion. The kits included items such as rocks, tree cookies, balls, wood planks, tubes, tires, ropes, and pulleys. Children (n = 183 at baseline) had their physical activity (accelerometers) and movement skills (TGMD-3 and PGMQ) measured before and after the intervention. All centres provided responses to environmental surveys (Go NAP SACC and Site Context Questionnaire), and educators in intervention sites participated in focus group and photovoice sessions. Educators were also provided with a full day professional development opportunity (plus ongoing mentoring) focused on physical activity, physical literacy, outdoor play, risk-taking, and loose parts. Parents participated in an interview addressing active outdoor play, physical literacy, and attitudes towards risk taking during play. DISCUSSION: This study will provide a better understanding of how integrating loose parts materials into outdoor play spaces impacts children's health, and the impact on educator and parent attitudes, beliefs, and understanding around physical literacy, active outdoor play and risk-taking during play.

Indexed as

child care centreearly childhoodeducatorsparentsphysical activitypreschool

Identifiers

PMID31164608
PMCPMC6632144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.