Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31164197›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2019

Alteration of Membrane Physicochemical Properties by Two Factors for Membrane Protein Integration.

Kaoru Nomura, Toshiyuki Yamaguchi, Shoko Mori, Kohki Fujikawa, Ken-Ichi Nishiyama, Toshinori Shimanouchi, Yasushi Tanimoto, Kenichi Morigaki, Keiko Shimamoto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Key contributions of a glycolipid to membrane protein integration.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kaoru NomuraBioorganic Research Institute, Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences, Kyoto, Japan. Electronic address: nomura@sunbor.or.jp.
Toshiyuki YamaguchiBioorganic Research Institute, Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences, Kyoto, Japan.
Shoko MoriBioorganic Research Institute, Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences, Kyoto, Japan.
Kohki FujikawaBioorganic Research Institute, Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences, Kyoto, Japan.
Ken-Ichi NishiyamaDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.
Toshinori ShimanouchiGraduate School of Environmental Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Yasushi TanimotoGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Kenichi MorigakiBiosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Keiko ShimamotoBioorganic Research Institute, Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences, Kyoto, Japan. Electronic address: shimamot@sunbor.or.jp.
Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences · JPKobe University · JPIwate University · JPOkayama University of Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After a nascent chain of a membrane protein emerges from the ribosomal tunnel, the protein is integrated into the cell membrane. This process is controlled by a series of proteinaceous molecular devices, such as signal recognition particles and Sec translocons. In addition to these proteins, we discovered two endogenous components regulating membrane protein integration in the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. The integration is blocked by diacylglycerol (DAG), whereas the blocking is relieved by a glycolipid named membrane protein integrase (MPIase). Here, we investigated the influence of these integration-blocking and integration-promoting factors on the physicochemical properties of membrane lipids via solid-state NMR and fluorescence measurements. These factors did not have destructive effects on membrane morphology because the membrane maintained its lamellar structure and did not fuse in the presence of DAG and/or MPIase at their effective concentrations. We next focused on membrane flexibility. DAG did not affect the mobility of the membrane surface, whereas the sugar chain in MPIase was highly mobile and enhanced the flexibility of membrane lipid headgroups. Comparison with a synthetic MPIase analog revealed the effects of the long sugar chain on membrane properties. The acyl chain order inside the membrane was increased by DAG, whereas the increase was cancelled by the addition of MPIase. MPIase also loosened the membrane lipid packing. Focusing on the transbilayer movement, MPIase reduced the rapid flip-flop motion of DAG. On the other hand, MPIase could not compensate for the diminished lateral diffusion by DAG. These results suggest that by manipulating the membrane lipids dynamics, DAG inhibits the protein from contacting the inner membrane, whereas the flexible long sugar chain of MPIase increases the opportunity for interaction between the membrane and the protein, leading to membrane integration of the newly formed protein.

Indexed as

DiglyceridesEscherichia coli ProteinsGlycoproteinsLipid BilayersMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMembrane LipidsMembrane ProteinsDiglyceridesEscherichia coli ProteinsGlycoproteinsLipid BilayersMembrane LipidsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31164197
PMCPMC6626835
OpenAlexW2946224892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.