Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31164161›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2019

Mutational landscape of gastric cancer and clinical application of genomic profiling based on target next-generation sequencing.

Hui Cai, Changqing Jing, Xusheng Chang, Dan Ding, Ting Han, Junchi Yang, Zhengmao Lu, Xuguang Hu, Zhaorui Liu, Jinshen Wang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Leveraging data-driven insights for esophageal and gastric cancer diagnosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hui CaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Changqing JingDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, China.
Xusheng ChangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Dan DingDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Ting HanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Junchi YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Zhengmao LuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Xuguang HuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Zhaorui LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Jinshen WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, China.
Liang ShangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, China.
Shouxin WuZhangjiang Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., 180 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201204, China.
Peng MengZhangjiang Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., 180 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201204, China.
Ling LinZhangjiang Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., 180 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201204, China.
Jiangman ZhaoZhangjiang Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., 180 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201204, China. zhaojiangman86@163.com.
Mingming NieDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China. niemm@smmu.edu.cn.
Kai YinDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China. kyin67@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1767-5210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer deaths, and an increased number of GC patients adopt to next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify tumor genomic alterations for precision medicine.

methodsIn this study, we established a hybridization capture-based NGS panel including 612 cancer-associated genes, and collected sequencing data of tumors and matched bloods from 153 gastric cancer patients. We performed comprehensive analysis of these sequencing and clinical data.

results35 significantly mutated genes were identified such as TP53, AKAP9, DRD2, PTEN, CDH1, LRP2 et al. Among them, 29 genes were novel significantly mutated genes compared with TCGA study. TP53 is the top frequently mutated gene, and tends to mutate in male (p = 0.025) patients and patients whose tumor located in cardia (p = 0.011). High tumor mutation burden (TMB) gathered in TP53 wild-type tumors (p = 0.045). TMB was also significantly associated with DNA damage repair (DDR) genes genotype (p = 0.047), Lauren classification (p = 1.5e-5), differentiation (1.9e-7), and HER2 status (p = 0.023). 38.31% of gastric cancer patients harbored at least one actionable alteration according to OncoKB database.

conclusionsWe drew a comprehensive mutational landscape of 153 gastric tumors and demonstrated utility of target next-generation sequencing to guide clinical management.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm StagingPrecision MedicineSequence Analysis, DNABiomarkers, TumorClinical actionable alterationsGastric cancerNext-generation sequencingTumor mutation burden

Identifiers

PMID31164161
PMCPMC6549266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.