Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2019
Trying to identify who may benefit most from future vitamin D intervention trials: a post hoc analysis from the VITDAL-ICU study excluding the early deaths.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D supplementation and mortality among critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- High Dose Vitamin D3 Supplementation Is Not Associated With Lower Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Clinical Outcomes for Critically Ill Patients: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Early High-Dose Vitamin DThe New England journal of medicine · 2019Trial
- Vitamin D: recent advances, associated factors, and its role in combating non-communicable diseases.NPJ science of food · 2025Review
- Review
- Vitamin D and chronic kidney disease: mechanisms, clinical implications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Should I Supplement Vitamin D in a Patient With Sepsis?Journal of acute medicine · 2024Article
- Causal effects of genetically vitamins and sepsis risk: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Potential benefits of vitamin D for sepsis prophylaxis in critical ill patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Vitamin D deficiency in critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Article
- Does Vitamin D Improve All-cause Mortality in Critically Ill Adults? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Article
- Pharmacometabolomics identifies candidate predictor metabolites of an L-carnitine treatment mortality benefit in septic shock.Clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Effect of Early Administration of Vitamin D on Clinical Outcome in Critically Ill Sepsis Patients: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Vitamin D and Its Potential Benefit for the COVID-19 Pandemic.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2021Review
- Endocrine Challenges in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Vitamin D assessment in perioperative medicine and critical care : A prospective observational pilot study.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVitamin D supplementation has shown promise for reducing mortality in the intensive care setting. As a steroid prohormone with pleiotropic effects, there may be a lag between administration and observing clinical benefit. This secondary analysis of the VITdAL-ICU study sought to explore whether the effect size of vitamin D on mortality was different when study participants who died or were discharged early were excluded.
methodsThe VITdAL-ICU study was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in critically ill adults who received placebo or 540,000 IU cholecalciferol followed by monthly supplementation. The effect of vitamin D on 28-day mortality was evaluated after exclusion of participants who died or were discharged within 7 days from study drug administration, according to vitamin D concentrations on day 3, using a bivariate analysis adjusted for confounders and in a stepwise multiple analysis.
resultsOf 475 study participants, 65 died or were discharged within the first 7 days. In the remaining 410 patients, vitamin D supplementation was associated with a reduction in 28-day mortality [OR 0.58 (95% CI 0.35-0.97) p value = 0.035]. The effect on mortality was not significant after adjusting for age, severity scores, female gender, chronic liver and kidney disease, COPD, diagnosis of the tumor, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors at enrollment (all p > 0.05). In a multiple model, the mortality reduction by vitamin D supplementation did not remain independently significant [OR 0.61 (95% CI 0.35-1.05) p = 0.075]. Vitamin D metabolite response, in the treatment group, demonstrated that survivors at 28 days, had higher levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (34.4 vs 25.4 ng/ml, p = 0.010) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (107.6 vs 70.3 pg/ml, p = 0.049) on day 3. The increase of plasma metabolites after vitamin D oral supplementation, independent of the baseline value, was associated with lower odds of death [OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.27-0.87) p value = 0.016].
conclusionsHigh-dose vitamin D3 supplementation was associated with a reduction of 28-day mortality in a mixed population of critically ill adults with vitamin D deficiency when excluding patients who died or were discharged within 7 days after study inclusion. However, this survival benefit was not independently confirmed when adjusted for other factors strongly associated with mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.