Trial reportStroke2019
Dosage Matters.
Trial report in Stroke, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimizing the Dose of Rehabilitation After Stroke.
Fast Training Promotes Recovery of Arm Movements Post-stroke Via Cerebellar-mediated Anticipatory Feedforward Control
Intensity-dependent Effects of 'Functional Activities Specific Training-Table' on Physical Performance in Stroke
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of physical therapy modalities for motor function, functional recovery, and post-stroke complications in patients with severe stroke: a systematic review update.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- The effect of time spent in rehabilitation on activity limitation and impairment after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Optimal exercise prescription for balance after stroke: a Bayesian dose-response network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Encouraging arm use in stroke survivors: the impact of smart reminders during a home-based intervention.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Trial
- Optimized Home Rehabilitation Technology Reduces Upper Extremity Impairment Compared to a Conventional Home Exercise Program: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Trial in Subacute Stroke.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of an intensified robot-assisted therapy in subacute stroke: a case control study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Trial
- The Efficiency, Efficacy, and Retention of Task Practice in Chronic Stroke.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2020Trial
- Robotic Technologies for Hand Recovery After Stroke: A Reflection on Research Paths in Honor of Dr. Steven Wolf.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2026Article
- Neurorehabilitation in the 21st Century: New Science, New Strategies, New Expectations.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2026Review
- To learn or not to learn? Model-based estimation of motor learning in a large, "in the wild", home rehabilitation database.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Wearable Myoelectric Interface for Neurorehabilitation (MINT) to Recover Arm Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2026Article
- A Streamlined 4-item Wolf Motor Function Test for Efficient Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2026Article
- Towards AI-based precision rehabilitation via contextual model-based reinforcement learning.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Collaborative AI for precision neurorehabilitation: a roadmap.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Factors Affecting Standing and Walking Outcomes for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury During In-Patient Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study on the Perspectives of Physiotherapists.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2025Article
- A Resource-Efficient, High-Dose, Gamified Neurorehabilitation Program for Chronic Stroke at Home: Retrospective Real-World Analysis.JMIR serious games · 2025Article
- Article
- The Impact of the Total Amount of Exercise Therapy on Post-Stroke Activities of Daily Living and Motor Function: A Meta-Analysis.Brain & NeuroRehabilitation · 2024Article
- Upper-Limb Functional Recovery in Chronic Stroke Patients after COVID-19-Interrupted Rehabilitation: An Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Purpose- For stroke rehabilitation, task-specific training in animal models and human rehabilitation trials is considered important to modulate neuroplasticity, promote motor learning, and functional recovery. Little is known about what constitutes an effective dosage of therapy. Methods- This is a parallel group, 4 arms, single-blind, phase IIb, randomized controlled trial of 4 dosages of arm therapy delivered in an outpatient setting chronically after stroke. Participants were randomized into groups that varied in duration of scheduled therapy (ie, 0, 15, 30, or 60 hours). Forty-one participants completed the study. Planned primary analyses used linear mixed effects regression to model changes from baseline to postintervention in the Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement rating and the Wolf Motor Function Test time score over 3 weeks of training as a function of therapy dosage. Results- We observed a dose response for the Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement: the model that included dose and dose by week interaction significantly better fit the data than the model that included week only (log-likelihood test, P=0.0026). In addition, the greater the dosage of training, the greater the change in Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement, with the dose by week interaction parameter equal to 0.0045 ( P=0.0016; 95% CI, 0.0018-0.0071). Over the 3 weeks of therapy, there was a gain of 0.92 in Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement for the 60-hour group compared to the 0-hour group. There was no dose response for the Wolf Motor Function Test. Conclusions- For mild-to-moderately impaired stroke survivors, the dosage of patient-centered, task-specific practice systematically influences the gain in quality of arm use but not functional capacity. We caution that we may have been underpowered for the functional capacity outcome. These findings highlight the importance of recovery outcomes that capture arm use in the natural environment. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01749358.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.