Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31164001›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology2019

Preserving genome integrity and function: the DNA damage response and histone modifications.

Jae Jin Kim, Seo Yun Lee, Kyle M Miller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Chromatin Perturbation Promotes Susceptibility to Hypomethylating Agents.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Dual roles of methylglyoxal in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025
    Review
  13. Role of BRCA1 in glioblastoma etiology.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Novel Techniques for Mapping DNA Damage and Repair in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jae Jin KimDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, LIVESTRONG Cancer Institute of the Dell Medical School, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin , Austin , TX , USA.
Seo Yun LeeDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, LIVESTRONG Cancer Institute of the Dell Medical School, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin , Austin , TX , USA.
Kyle M MillerDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, LIVESTRONG Cancer Institute of the Dell Medical School, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin , Austin , TX , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4544-0013

Funding

Shaping DNA Damage Response Networks Via Histone H2A VariantsR01CA198279 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Kyle M Miller · 2016 to 2026
$3.3M
MECHANISMS OF GENOME MAINTENANCE BY BROMODOMAIN CHROMATIN READER PROTEINSR01CA201268 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MILLER, KYLE M · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA198279NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modulation of chromatin templates in response to cellular cues, including DNA damage, relies heavily on the post-translation modification of histones. Numerous types of histone modifications including phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, and ubiquitylation occur on specific histone residues in response to DNA damage. These histone marks regulate both the structure and function of chromatin, allowing for the transition between chromatin states that function in undamaged condition to those that occur in the presence of DNA damage. Histone modifications play well-recognized roles in sensing, processing, and repairing damaged DNA to ensure the integrity of genetic information and cellular homeostasis. This review highlights our current understanding of histone modifications as they relate to DNA damage responses (DDRs) and their involvement in genome maintenance, including the potential targeting of histone modification regulators in cancer, a disease that exhibits both epigenetic dysregulation and intrinsic DNA damage.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairHistone CodeAnimalsChromatinEpigenesis, GeneticGenomic InstabilityHistonesHumansNeoplasmsChromatinHistonesChromatinDNA damageDNA double-strand break repairgenome integrityhistonesmodificationstranscription

Identifiers

PMID31164001
PMCPMC6715524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.