ArticleOptics express2019
Metallic photonic crystal-based sensor for cryogenic environments.
Article in Optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel dual filtering mechanism for laser safety eyewear with polycarbonate lens coated by zirconium dioxide and silicon dioxide.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigate the design, characterization, and application of metallic photonic crystal (MPC) structures, consisting of plasmonic gold nanogratings on top of a photonic waveguide, as transducers for lab-on-chip biosensing in cryogenic environments. The compact design offers a promising approach to sensitive, in situ biosensing platforms for astrobiology applications (e.g., on the "icy moons" of the outer solar system). We fabricated and experimentally characterized three MPC sensor geometries, with variable nanograting width, at temperatures ranging from 300 K to 180 K. Sensors with wider nanogratings were more sensitive to changes in the local dielectric environment. Temperature-dependent experiments revealed an increase in plasmonic resonance intensity of around 13% at 180 K (compared with 300 K), while the coupled plasmonic-photonic resonance was less sensitive to temperature, varying by less than 5%. Simulation results confirm the relative temperature stability of the plasmonic-photonic mode and, combined with its high sensitivity, suggest a novel application of this mode as the sensing transduction mechanism over wide temperature ranges. To our knowledge, this is among the first reports of the design and characterization of a nanoplasmonic sensor specifically for low-temperature sensing operation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.