Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31163386›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2019

Automated fiber tract reconstruction for surgery planning: Extensive validation in language-related white matter tracts.

Matteo Mancini, Sjoerd B Vos, Vejay N Vakharia, Aidan G O'Keeffe, Karin Trimmel, Frederik Barkhof, Christian Dorfer, Salil Soman, Gavin P Winston, Chengyuan Wu and 3 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Matteo ManciniCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.mancini@ucl.ac.uk.
Sjoerd B VosCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, United Kingdom.
Vejay N VakhariaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, University College London, London, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
Aidan G O'KeeffeDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
Karin TrimmelEpilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, University College London, London, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK; Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Frederik BarkhofCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London, London, UK; Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Christian DorferDepartment of Neurosurgery, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Salil SomanHarvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA 00215, United States.
Gavin P WinstonEpilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Chengyuan WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John S DuncanEpilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, University College London, London, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
Rachel SparksSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Sebastien OurselinSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M00841X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion MRI and tractography hold great potential for surgery planning, especially to preserve eloquent white matter during resections. However, fiber tract reconstruction requires an expert with detailed understanding of neuroanatomy. Several automated approaches have been proposed, using different strategies to reconstruct the white matter tracts in a supervised fashion. However, validation is often limited to comparison with manual delineation by overlap-based measures, which is limited in characterizing morphological and topological differences. In this work, we set up a fully automated pipeline based on anatomical criteria that does not require manual intervention, taking advantage of atlas-based criteria and advanced acquisition protocols available on clinical-grade MRI scanners. Then, we extensively validated it on epilepsy patients with specific focus on language-related bundles. The validation procedure encompasses different approaches, including simple overlap with manual segmentations from two experts, feasibility ratings from external multiple clinical raters and relation with task-based functional MRI. Overall, our results demonstrate good quantitative agreement between automated and manual segmentation, in most cases better performances of the proposed method in qualitative terms, and meaningful relationships with task-based fMRI. In addition, we observed significant differences between experts in terms of both manual segmentation and external ratings. These results offer important insights on how different levels of validation complement each other, supporting the idea that overlap-based measures, although quantitative, do not offer a full perspective on the similarities and differences between automated and manual methods.

Indexed as

LanguagePreoperative CareAdultBrain MappingDiffusion Tensor ImagingEpilepsy, Temporal LobeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresWhite Matter

Identifiers

PMID31163386
PMCPMC6545442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.