Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31163285›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2019

The neuronal stimulation-transcription coupling map.

Kelsey M Tyssowski, Jesse M Gray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. RyR-mediated CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kelsey M TyssowskiHarvard Medical School, Department of Genetics, 77 Ave Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Jesse M GrayHarvard Medical School, Department of Genetics, 77 Ave Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, United States. Electronic address: gray@genetics.med.harvard.edu.

Funding

Genomic mechanisms of firing rate homeostasisR01MH116223 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DYMECKI, SUSAN M. · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
The algorithms used by the genome to interpret neural activityR01MH101528 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI GRAY, JESSE MICHAEL · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101528NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons transcribe different genes in response to different extracellular stimuli, and these genes regulate neuronal plasticity. Thus, understanding how different stimuli regulate different stimulus-dependent gene modules would deepen our understanding of plasticity. To systematically dissect the coupling between stimulation and transcription, we propose creating a 'stimulation-transcription coupling map' that describes the transcription response to each possible extracellular stimulus. While we are currently far from having a complete map, recent genomic experiments have begun to facilitate its creation. Here, we describe the current state of the stimulation-transcription coupling map as well as the transcriptional regulation that enables this coupling.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationNeuronsNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

PMID31163285
PMCPMC6885097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.