Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2019
An Association Between Large Optic Nerve Cupping and Cognitive Function.
Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oculomics meets exposomics: a roadmap for applying multi-modal ocular biomarkers in precision environmental health research.Exposome · 2025Review
- PMToxics · 2024Article
- Roles of Cognitive Function on Visual Field Reliability Indices among Glaucoma Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Association of macular pigment optical density with retinal layer thicknesses in eyes with and without manifest primary open-angle glaucoma.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Cupping alleviates lung injury through the adenosine/AHeliyon · 2022Article
- Association between cognitive function and large optic nerve cupping, accounting for cup-disc-ratio genetic risk score.PloS one · 2022Article
- Computed Tomography Density and β-Amyloid Deposition of Intraorbital Optic Nerve May Assist in Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease: AFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine if a larger cup-to-disc ratio is associated with poor cognitive function in postmenopausal women without glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
methodsWe used data from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone trial, originally designed to test effects of hormone therapy (HT) on various health outcomes. Large cup-to-disc ratio was defined as greater than 0.6 in either eye based on stereoscopic optic nerve photographs. Global cognitive function was assessed annually by Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MSE) in the WHI Memory Study. Exclusions were no information on optic nerve grading; no 3MSE scores at the time of the eye examination, ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure >23 mm Hg, Goldmann applanation tonometry), or glaucoma medication use. A generalized linear model for log-transformed 3MSE scores was used for determining the association between large cup-to-disc ratio and 3MSE scores, adjusting for age, race, diabetes, body mass index, cardiovascular disease, smoking, HT randomization, education, and diabetic retinopathy.
resultsAnalyses included 1636 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 69.57 ± 3.64 years; 90.39% white). Of those, 122 women had large cup-to-disc ratio. The mean 3MSE scores in women with vs without large cup-to-disc ratio were 95.4 ± 6 vs 96.6 ± 5. In the adjusted model, women with large cup-to-disc ratio had statistically significantly lower 3MSE scores, compared with those without large cup-to-disc ratio, yielding the predicted mean difference in 3MSE scores of 0.75 with a standard error of 0.05 units (P = .04).
conclusionsPostmenopausal women who had large cup-to-disc ratio without glaucoma or ocular hypertension exhibited lower global cognitive function. Further investigation is warranted. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.