Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31162875›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2019

Multilingual assessment of early child development: Analyses from repeated observations of children in Kenya.

Heather A Knauer, Patricia Kariger, Pamela Jakiela, Owen Ozier, Lia C H Fernald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A shared reading intervention: Changing perceptions of caregivers in a semi-rural township.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2023
    Article
  3. Development and evaluation of the Ingwavuma receptive vocabulary test: A tool for assessing receptive vocabulary in isiZulu-speaking preschool children.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Cultural and Linguistic Adaptation of Diagnostic Language Assessments: A Scoping Review.International journal of language & communication disorders
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather A KnauerBerkeley School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8617-8958
Patricia KarigerCenter for Effective Global Action, University of California, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0169-772X
Pamela JakielaCenter for Global Development, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0002-5056-650X
Owen OzierHuman Development Team, The World Bank Development Research Group, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0001-6088-0888
Lia C H FernaldBerkeley School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-4607

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many low- and middle-income countries, young children learn a mother tongue or indigenous language at home before entering the formal education system where they will need to understand and speak a country's official language(s). Thus, assessments of children before school age, conducted in a nation's official language, may not fully reflect a child's development, underscoring the importance of test translation and adaptation. To examine differences in vocabulary development by language of assessment, we adapted and validated instruments to measure developmental outcomes, including expressive and receptive vocabulary. We assessed 505 2-to-6-year-old children in rural communities in Western Kenya with comparable vocabulary tests in three languages: Luo (the local language or mother tongue), Swahili, and English (official languages) at two time points, 5-6 weeks apart, between September 2015 and October 2016. Younger children responded to the expressive vocabulary measure exclusively in Luo (44%-59% of 2-to-4-year-olds) much more frequently than did older children (20%-21% of 5-to-6-year-olds). Baseline receptive vocabulary scores in Luo (β = 0.26, SE = 0.05, p < 0.001) and Swahili (β = 0.10, SE = 0.05, p = 0.032) were strongly associated with receptive vocabulary in English at follow-up, even after controlling for English vocabulary at baseline. Parental Luo literacy at baseline (β = 0.11, SE = 0.05, p = 0.045) was associated with child English vocabulary at follow-up, while parental English literacy at baseline was not. Our findings suggest that multilingual testing is essential to understanding the developmental environment and cognitive growth of multilingual children.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentLanguage TestsMultilingualismChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansKenyaLanguageLearningLiteracyMaleParentsRural PopulationSchoolsBPVSlanguage of instructionMDATmultilingual environmentsPPVTschool readiness

Identifiers

PMID31162875
PMCPMC6771616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.