Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31162477›Full record

ReviewJournal of Intelligence2018

Does Intraindividual Variability of Personality States Improve Perspective Taking? An Ecological Approach Integrating Personality and Social Cognition.

Richard Wundrack, Julia Prager, Eva Asselmann, Garret O'Connell, Jule Specht

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Intelligence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard WundrackDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany. richard.wundrack@hu-berlin.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2121-0982
Julia PragerDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany. julia.prager.1@hu-berlin.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6798-8728
Eva AsselmannDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany. asselmae@hu-berlin.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2132-8852
Garret O'ConnellDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany. garret.oconnell@hu-berlin.de.
Jule SpechtDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany. jule.specht@hu-berlin.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research integrating cognitive abilities and personality has focused on the role of personality traits. We propose a theory on the role of intraindividual variability of personality states (hereafter state variability) on perspective taking, in particular, the ability to infer other peoples' mental states. First, we review the relevant research on personality psychology and social cognition. Second, we propose two complementary routes by which state variability relates to anchoring and adjustment in perspective taking. The first route, termed ego-dispersion, suggests that an increased state variability decreases egocentric bias, which reduces anchoring. The second route, termed perspective-pooling, suggests that an increased state variability facilitates efficient adjustment. We also discuss how our theory can be investigated empirically. The theory is rooted in an ecological interpretation of personality and social cognition, and flags new ways for integrating these fields of research.

Indexed as

adjustmentanchoringbig five personality traitsegocentric biasintraindividual variabilitypersonality statesperspective takingsimulationtheory of mindwhole trait theory

Identifiers

PMID31162477
PMCPMC6480758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.