ArticleCritical care medicine2019
Outcome Prediction in Postanoxic Coma With Deep Learning.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electroencephalogram-based machine learning models to predict neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest: A systematic review.Resuscitation · 2024Pooled it
- Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Comatose Adult Survivors of Cardiac Arrest.Neurocritical care · 2023Guideline
- EEG for bedside monitoring: the intensivist's point of view.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Stepwise clinical and diagnostic strategy for coma of unknown origin.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- EEG-based machine-learning prognostication in comatose patients with indeterminate outcome after cardiac arrest.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- How much information is needed to predict outcomes after cardiac arrest?Resuscitation · 2025Article
- Multimodal Deep Learning for ARDS Detection.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in resuscitation: a scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- Article
- Can artificial intelligence improve the diagnosis and prognosis of disorders of consciousness? A scoping review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in predicting neurological outcomes in postcardiac resuscitation.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Resuscitation: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Auditory stimulation and deep learning predict awakening from coma after cardiac arrest.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Deep learning for EEG-based prognostication after cardiac arrest: from current research to future clinical applications.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Machine learning and clinical neurophysiology.Journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Can we learn from hidden mistakes? Self-fulfilling prophecy and responsible neuroprognostic innovation.Journal of medical ethics · 2022Article
- Outcome Prediction of Postanoxic Coma: A Comparison of Automated Electroencephalography Analysis Methods.Neurocritical care · 2022Article
- Predicting Neurological Outcome From Electroencephalogram Dynamics in Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest With Deep Learning.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022Article
- Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Identifies Distinct Physiological States After Acute Brain Injury.Neurocritical care · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesVisual assessment of the electroencephalogram by experienced clinical neurophysiologists allows reliable outcome prediction of approximately half of all comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Deep neural networks hold promise to achieve similar or even better performance, being more objective and consistent.
designProspective cohort study.
settingMedical ICU of five teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: Eight-hundred ninety-five consecutive comatose patients after cardiac arrest.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsContinuous electroencephalogram was recorded during the first 3 days after cardiac arrest. Functional outcome at 6 months was classified as good (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) or poor (Cerebral Performance Category 3-5). We trained a convolutional neural network, with a VGG architecture (introduced by the Oxford Visual Geometry Group), to predict neurologic outcome at 12 and 24 hours after cardiac arrest using electroencephalogram epochs and outcome labels as inputs. Output of the network was the probability of good outcome. Data from two hospitals were used for training and internal validation (n = 661). Eighty percent of these data was used for training and cross-validation, the remaining 20% for independent internal validation. Data from the other three hospitals were used for external validation (n = 234). Prediction of poor outcome was most accurate at 12 hours, with a sensitivity in the external validation set of 58% (95% CI, 51-65%) at false positive rate of 0% (CI, 0-7%). Good outcome could be predicted at 12 hours with a sensitivity of 48% (CI, 45-51%) at a false positive rate of 5% (CI, 0-15%) in the external validation set.
conclusionsDeep learning of electroencephalogram signals outperforms any previously reported outcome predictor of coma after cardiac arrest, including visual electroencephalogram assessment by trained electroencephalogram experts. Our approach offers the potential for objective and real time, bedside insight in the neurologic prognosis of comatose patients after cardiac arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.