Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31162130›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Characteristics of Adopters of an Online Social Networking Physical Activity Mobile Phone App: Cluster Analysis.

Ilea Sanders, Camille E Short, Svetlana Bogomolova, Tyman Stanford, Ronald Plotnikoff, Corneel Vandelanotte, Tim Olds, Sarah Edney, Jillian Ryan, Rachel G Curtis and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Using photovoice to explore young women's experiences of behaviour change techniques in physical activity mobile apps.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ilea SandersAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7527-2057
Camille E ShortFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4177-4251
Svetlana BogomolovaEhrenberg-Bass Institute, School of Marketing, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4449-6514
Tyman StanfordSchool of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8570-5493
Ronald PlotnikoffPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3763-8273
Corneel VandelanottePhysical Activity Research Group, Central Queensland University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4445-8094
Tim OldsAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6894-5519
Sarah EdneyAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3925-517X
Jillian RyanAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0655-3047
Rachel G CurtisAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1341-7804
Carol MaherAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8676-0224
University of South Australia · AUCentral Queensland University · AUFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, many online health behavior programs developed by researchers have not been translated at scale. To inform translational efforts, health researchers must work with marketing experts to design cost-effective marketing campaigns. It is important to understand the characteristics of end users of a given health promotion program and identify key market segments.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the characteristics of the adopters of Active Team, a gamified online social networking physical activity app, and identify potential market segments to inform future research translation efforts.

methodsParticipants (N=545) were Australian adults aged 18 to 65 years who responded to general advertisements to join a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the Active Team app. At baseline they provided demographic (age, sex, education, marital status, body mass index, location of residence, and country of birth), behavioral (sleep, assessed by the Pittsburgh Quality Sleep Index) and physical activity (assessed by the Active Australia Survey), psychographic information (health and well-being, assessed by the PERMA [Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, Achievement] Profile; depression, anxiety and stress, assessed by the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale [DASS-21]; and quality of life, assessed by the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12]). Descriptive analyses and a k-medoids cluster analysis were performed using the software R 3.3.0 (The R Foundation) to identify key characteristics of the sample.

resultsCluster analyses revealed four clusters: (1) younger inactive women with poor well-being (218/545), characterized by a higher score on the DASS-21, low mental component summary score on the SF-12, and relatively young age; (2) older, active women (153/545), characterized by a lower score on DASS-21, a higher overall score on the SF-12, and relatively older age; (3) young, active but stressed men (58/545) with a higher score on DASS-21 and higher activity levels; and (4) older, low active and obese men (30/545), characterized by a high body mass index and lower activity levels.

conclusionsUnderstanding the characteristics of population segments attracted to a health promotion program will guide the development of cost-effective research translation campaigns.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12617000113358; https://www.anzctr.org .au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371463. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12889-017-4882-7.

Indexed as

Social NetworkingAdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaCluster AnalysisExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsSocial TheorySurveys and Questionnairesk-medoid cluster analysismobile phone apponline social networkingphysical activitysocial marketing

Identifiers

PMID31162130
PMCPMC6746062
OpenAlexW2940418247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.