Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31161906›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Environmental heterogeneity decreases reproductive success via effects on foraging behaviour.

Alice M Trevail, Jonathan A Green, Jonathan Sharples, Jeff A Polton, Peter I Miller, Francis Daunt, Ellie Owen, Mark Bolton, Kendrew Colhoun, Stephen Newton and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alice M Trevail1 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK.
Jonathan A Green1 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK.
Jonathan Sharples1 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK.
Jeff A Polton2 National Oceanography Centre , Liverpool , UK.
Peter I Miller3 Remote Sensing Group, Plymouth Marine Laboratory , Plymouth , UK.
Francis Daunt4 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Edinburgh , Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian , UK.
Ellie Owen5 RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, RSPB Scotland, Etive House, Beechwood Park, Inverness , UK.
Mark Bolton6 RSPB Centre for Conservation Science , The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire , UK.
Kendrew Colhoun7 RSPB Centre for Conservation Science , Belfast , UK.
Stephen Newton9 BirdWatch Ireland, Kilcoole , Wicklow , Ireland.
Gail Robertson10 School of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , UK.
Samantha C Patrick1 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental heterogeneity shapes the uneven distribution of resources available to foragers, and is ubiquitous in nature. Optimal foraging theory predicts that an animal's ability to exploit resource patches is key to foraging success. However, the potential fitness costs and benefits of foraging in a heterogeneous environment are difficult to measure empirically. Heterogeneity may provide higher-quality foraging opportunities, or alternatively could increase the cost of resource acquisition because of reduced patch density or increased competition. Here, we study the influence of physical environmental heterogeneity on behaviour and reproductive success of black-legged kittiwakes, Rissa tridactyla. From GPS tracking data at 15 colonies throughout their British and Irish range, we found that environments that were physically more heterogeneous were associated with longer trip duration, more time spent foraging while away from the colony, increased overlap of foraging areas between individuals and lower breeding success. These results suggest that there is greater competition between individuals for finite resources in more heterogeneous environments, which comes at a cost to reproduction. Resource hotspots are often considered beneficial, as individuals can learn to exploit them if sufficiently predictable. However, we demonstrate here that such fitness gains can be countered by greater competition in more heterogeneous environments.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalEcosystemAnimalsBreedingCharadriiformesFeeding BehaviorIrelandReproductionTime FactorsUnited Kingdomcompetitionheterogeneity gradienthidden Markov modeloptimal foraging theoryresource availabilityseabird

Identifiers

PMID31161906
PMCPMC6571457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.