Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31161903›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Symbolic representation of numerosity by honeybees ( Apis mellifera): matching characters to small quantities.

Scarlett R Howard, Aurore Avarguès-Weber, Jair E Garcia, Andrew D Greentree, Adrian G Dyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Association neurons in the crow telencephalon link visual signs to numerical values.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparative psychophysics of colour preferences in two species of non-eusocial Australian native halictid bees.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Behavioral and Neuronal Representation of Numerosity Zero in the Crow.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Ants Can Anticipate the Following Quantity in an Arithmetic Sequence.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Different mechanisms underlie implicit visual statistical learning in honey bees and humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Reply to comment on HowardProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scarlett R Howard1 Bio-inspired Digital Sensing (BIDS) Lab, School of Media and Communication, RMIT University , Melbourne, Victoria , Australia.
Aurore Avarguès-Weber3 Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS , Toulouse , France.
Jair E Garcia1 Bio-inspired Digital Sensing (BIDS) Lab, School of Media and Communication, RMIT University , Melbourne, Victoria , Australia.
Andrew D Greentree2 ARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, School of Science, RMIT University , Melbourne, Victoria , Australia.
Adrian G Dyer1 Bio-inspired Digital Sensing (BIDS) Lab, School of Media and Communication, RMIT University , Melbourne, Victoria , Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assignment of a symbolic representation to a specific numerosity is a fundamental requirement for humans solving complex mathematical calculations used in diverse applications such as algebra, accounting, physics and everyday commerce. Here we show that honeybees are able to learn to match a sign to a numerosity, or a numerosity to a sign, and subsequently transfer this knowledge to novel numerosity stimuli changed in colour properties, shape and configuration. While honeybees learned the associations between two quantities (two; three) and two signs (N-shape; inverted T-shape), they failed at reversing their specific task of sign-to-numerosity matching to numerosity-to-sign matching and vice versa (i.e. a honeybee that learned to match a sign to a number of elements was not able to invert this learning to match the numerosity of elements to a sign). Thus, while bees could learn the association between a symbol and numerosity, it was linked to the specific task and bees could not spontaneously extrapolate the association to a novel, reversed task. Our study therefore reveals that the basic requirement for numerical symbolic representation can be fulfilled by an insect brain, suggesting that the absence of its spontaneous emergence in animals is not due to cognitive limitation.

Indexed as

Discrimination LearningAnimalsBeesBrainPattern Recognition, VisualApis melliferadelayed-matching-to-samplenumbernumericalPiaget's theorysign

Identifiers

PMID31161903
PMCPMC6571477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.