Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31161662›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2020

Comparison of effectiveness and drug cost between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and biguanide as the first-line anti-hyperglycaemic medication among Japanese working generation with type 2 diabetes.

Noriko Ihana-Sugiyama, Takehiro Sugiyama, Hirokazu Tanaka, Kohjiro Ueki, Yasuki Kobayashi, Mitsuru Ohsugi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Noriko Ihana-SugiyamaDiabetes and Metabolism Information Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3969-7728
Takehiro SugiyamaDiabetes and Metabolism Information Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5391-682X
Hirokazu TanakaDiabetes and Metabolism Information Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3153-8802
Kohjiro UekiDiabetes Research Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
Yasuki KobayashiDepartment of Public Health/Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8654, Japan.
Mitsuru OhsugiDiabetes and Metabolism Information Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
National Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPDepartment of Health · IEUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

Grant of National Center or Global Health and Medicine 26-D-002Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant H29-Cardiovascular-General-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesDipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) is widely used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in several countries such as Japan, whereas biguanide (BG; mostly metformin) is recommended as a first-line antidiabetic medication in many countries according to evidence mainly from Western countries. Although previous studies reported that DPP4i may be more efficacious for East Asians, direct comparisons of effectiveness and cost between DPP4i and BG have never been conducted in East Asia.

methodsWe extracted claims and medical check-up data (observation period from January 2010 to March 2016) of adult patients under 70 years old with T2DM who received DPP4i or BG as first-line antidiabetic drugs. Changes in HbA1c and BMI before and 2 years after the first prescription and annual cost of antidiabetic medication during the second year were compared between the DPP4i and BG groups.

resultsWe extracted 1034 patients who received DPP4i and 365 patients who received BG as the first antidiabetic medication (male sex, 83.0% and 84.9%; HbA1c (mean [SD]), 7.7 [1.4]% and 7.9 [1.4]%; BMI, 26.6 [4.5] kg/m

conclusionsThe first antidiabetic prescription for the patient was mostly continued thereafter. BG may be recommendable as the first-line medication for patients with T2DM, especially for middle-aged, male population with greater BMI. It is worth addressing the discrepancy between practice in Japan and that recommended in international guidelines.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsMetforminAdultDipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-PeptidasesDrug CostsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsJapanMaleMiddle AgedDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsDipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-PeptidasesHypoglycemic AgentsMetformindipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitormetformintype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31161662
PMCPMC7004211
OpenAlexW2948670385

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.