Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31161556›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019

Position-based modeling of lesion displacement in ultrasound-guided breast biopsy.

Eleonora Tagliabue, Diego Dall'Alba, Enrico Magnabosco, Chiara Tenga, Igor Peterlik, Paolo Fiorini

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Augmented Reality-Assisted Ultrasound Breast Biopsy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Biomechanical modelling of probe to tissue interaction during ultrasound scanning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eleonora TagliabueDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Str. le Grazie 15, Verona, Italy. eleonora.tagliabue@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1536-2293
Diego Dall'AlbaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Str. le Grazie 15, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7300-5975
Enrico MagnaboscoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Str. le Grazie 15, Verona, Italy.
Chiara TengaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Str. le Grazie 15, Verona, Italy.
Igor PeterlikINRIA, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-625X
Paolo FioriniDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Str. le Grazie 15, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0711-8605
University of Verona · ITInstitut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique · FR

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 742671Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 688188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough ultrasound (US) images represent the most popular modality for guiding breast biopsy, malignant regions are often missed by sonography, thus preventing accurate lesion localization which is essential for a successful procedure. Biomechanical models can support the localization of suspicious areas identified on a preoperative image during US scanning since they are able to account for anatomical deformations resulting from US probe pressure. We propose a deformation model which relies on position-based dynamics (PBD) approach to predict the displacement of internal targets induced by probe interaction during US acquisition.

methodsThe PBD implementation available in NVIDIA FleX is exploited to create an anatomical model capable of deforming online. Simulation parameters are initialized on a calibration phantom under different levels of probe-induced deformations; then, they are fine-tuned by minimizing the localization error of a US-visible landmark of a realistic breast phantom. The updated model is used to estimate the displacement of other internal lesions due to probe-tissue interaction.

resultsThe localization error obtained when applying the PBD model remains below 11 mm for all the tumors even for input displacements in the order of 30 mm. This proposed method obtains results aligned with FE models with faster computational performance, suitable for real-time applications. In addition, it outperforms rigid model used to track lesion position in US-guided breast biopsies, at least halving the localization error for all the displacement ranges considered.

conclusionPosition-based dynamics approach has proved to be successful in modeling breast tissue deformations during US acquisition. Its stability, accuracy and real-time performance make such model suitable for tracking lesions displacement during US-guided breast biopsy.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyImaging, Three-DimensionalUltrasonography, MammaryAlgorithmsBiopsyBreastBreast NeoplasmsCalibrationComputer SimulationHumansModels, AnatomicPatient PositioningPhantoms, ImagingRoboticsSoftwareBiomechanical modelPosition-based dynamicsUltrasound-guided breast biopsyUltrasound tracking

Identifiers

PMID31161556
OpenAlexW2948347114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.