Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31161531›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2019

Evaluating Patient Experiences in Dry Eye Disease Through Social Media Listening Research.

Nigel Cook, Anmol Mullins, Raju Gautam, Sharath Medi, Clementine Prince, Nishith Tyagi, Jyothi Kommineni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nigel CookNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. nigel.cook@novartis.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8211-7613
Anmol MullinsNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Raju GautamNovartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India.
Sharath MediNovartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India.
Clementine PrinceNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Nishith TyagiNovartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India.
Jyothi KommineniNovartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocial media listening (SML) is an approach to assess patient experience in different indications. This is the first study to report the results of using SML to understand patients' experiences of living with dry eye disease (DED).

methodsPublicly available, English-language social media content between December 2016 and August 2017 was searched employing pre-defined criteria using Social Studio

resultsIn all, 2279 possible patient records were identified following NLP, which were filtered for relevance to disease area by analysts, resulting in a total of 1192 posts which formed the basis of this study. Of these, 77% (n = 915) were from the USA. Symptoms, causes, diagnosis and treatments were the most commonly discussed themes. Most common symptoms mentioned were eye dryness (138/901), pain (114/901) and blurry vision (110/901). Pharmaceutical drugs (prescription and over-the-counter; 55%; 764/1393), followed by medical devices (20%; 280/1393), were mentioned as major options for managing symptoms. Of the pharmaceutical drugs, eye drops (33%; 158/476) and artificial tears (10%; 49/476) were the most common over-the-counter options reported, and Restasis

conclusionsInsights revealed using SML strengthen our understanding about patient experiences and their unmet needs in DED. This study illustrates that an SML approach contributed effectively in generating patient insights, which can be utilised to inform early drug development process, market access strategies and stakeholder discussions.

fundingNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. Plain language summary available for this article.

Indexed as

Disease burdenDry eyePatients’ experiencesQuality of lifeSocial mediaTwitterUnmet needs

Identifiers

PMID31161531
PMCPMC6692792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.