Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31161488›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2019

Long-term clinical, functional, and cost outcomes for early rheumatoid arthritis patients who did or did not achieve early remission in a real-world treat-to-target strategy.

Peter M Ten Klooster, Martijn A H Oude Voshaar, Walid Fakhouri, Inmaculada de la Torre, Claudia Nicolay, Mart A F J van de Laar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pregnancy Outcomes of Women Veterans with Autoimmune Disease.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Peter M Ten KloosterTransparency in Healthcare, Hengelo, The Netherlands. P.M.tenKlooster@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2565-5439
Martijn A H Oude VoshaarTransparency in Healthcare, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
Walid FakhouriEli Lilly and Company, Windlesham, Surrey, UK.
Inmaculada de la TorreEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Claudia NicolayLilly Deutschland GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Mart A F J van de LaarTransparency in Healthcare, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
Eli Lilly (Germany) · DEEli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GBEli Lilly (United States) · USMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLUniversity of Twente · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NL

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo retrospectively compare the long-term clinical, functional, and cost outcomes for early RA patients (symptoms < 1 year) who did or did not achieve early remission in a treat-to-target strategy.

methodFive-year data of 471 patients included in the DREAM remission induction cohort were used. Patients were treated according to a pre-specified 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) remission driven step-up treatment strategy starting with methotrexate, addition of sulfasalazine, and exchange of sulfasalazine for biological medication in case of failure. Two- and 3-year healthcare costs were available for selected subsamples of patients only.

resultsDAS28 remission was achieved in 27.7%, 38.2%, and 51.6% of patients at 2, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Achieving DAS28 remission at 2, 3, or 6 months was consistently associated with significantly lower DAS28 and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability scores at 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up (all P values < 0.02). Patients in remission at 2, 3, or 6 months also had significantly lower medication costs per patient over the first 2 and 3 years of treatment, mainly due to lower biologic use, but differences in total healthcare resource costs (hospital admissions plus consultations) were less pronounced. Mean total medication and total healthcare resource costs at 3 years were €1131 and €1757 for patients in remission at 6 months vs. €7533 (P < 0.01) and €2202 (P = 0.09) for those not in remission.

conclusionAchieving early remission was associated with beneficial clinical outcomes for early RA patients and lower costs in the long term. Key Points • Previous studies in rheumatoid arthritis patients have demonstrated that early good response is associated with sustained remission and better long-term clinical outcomes. • This study extents these findings by examining the long-term benefits of achieving early remission on clinical, patient-reported, and economic outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis treated according to treat-to-target principles. • The findings of this study clearly demonstrate that aiming for early remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients is beneficial in the long-term in terms of better clinical and functional outcomes and lower healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsRemission InductionAdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsFemaleHumansMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSulfasalazineTreatment OutcomeBiological ProductsMethotrexateSulfasalazineDisease activityReal-world dataRemissionRheumatoid arthritisTight controlTreat-to-target

Identifiers

PMID31161488
OpenAlexW2948648248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.