Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31161460›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2019

Exercise in Heart Failure-What Is the Optimal Dose to Improve Pathophysiology and Exercise Capacity?

Michael Johannes Schindler, Volker Adams, Martin Halle

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael Johannes SchindlerDepartment of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Georg-Brauchle-Ring 56, 80992, Munich, Germany. michael.schindler@mri.tum.de.
Volker AdamsLaboratory for Experimental and Molecular Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Martin HalleDepartment of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Georg-Brauchle-Ring 56, 80992, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn this review, our aim is to summarize the evidence of exercise interventions in heart failure. Addressing pathophysiology, we discuss training modalities and optimal dose finding in exercising patients with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). RECENT

findingsWhile smaller studies showed a trend towards improved exercise capacity by high-intensity interval training in comparison with moderate continuous training in HFrEF, recent multicenter randomized trials were unable to confirm these findings. Considering the lack of effective drug therapies in HFpEF, exercise training plays an even more important role in this particular population. Exercise training in heart failure is beneficial in addition to medical and device therapy. Data are still mostly limited to HFrEF. Intensity should primarily be moderate at a daily base. The concept of "the higher the better" could not be confirmed for HFrEF. The overall concept of training is to maximally strain the periphery without straining the myocardium.

Indexed as

ExerciseStroke VolumeExercise ToleranceHeart FailureHumansOxygenOxygen ConsumptionQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVentricular Function, LeftOxygenExercise trainingHeart failureHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionHeart failure with reduced ejection fractionHigh-intensity interval trainingModerate continuous training

Identifiers

PMID31161460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.