Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31161430›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020

Cell Nuclei Segmentation in Cytological Images Using Convolutional Neural Network and Seeded Watershed Algorithm.

Marek Kowal, Michał Żejmo, Marcin Skobel, Józef Korbicz, Roman Monczak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatial Transcriptomic Analyses of Spermatogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Whole-Slide Imaging, Mutual Information Registration for Multiplex Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Graph-Theoretic Post-Processing of Segmentation With Application to Dense Biofilms.IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marek KowalInstitute of Control and Computation Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Szafrana 2, 65-516, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Michał ŻejmoInstitute of Control and Computation Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Szafrana 2, 65-516, Zielona Góra, Poland. mzejmo@uz.zgora.pl.
Marcin SkobelInstitute of Control and Computation Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Szafrana 2, 65-516, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Józef KorbiczInstitute of Control and Computation Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Szafrana 2, 65-516, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Roman MonczakDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital in Zielona Góra, Zyty 26, 65-046, Zielona Góra, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphometric analysis of nuclei is crucial in cytological examinations. Unfortunately, nuclei segmentation presents many challenges because they usually create complex clusters in cytological samples. To deal with this problem, we are proposing an approach, which combines convolutional neural network and watershed transform to segment nuclei in cytological images of breast cancer. The method initially is preprocessing images using color deconvolution to highlight hematoxylin-stained objects (nuclei). Next, convolutional neural network is applied to perform semantic segmentation of preprocessed image. It finds nuclei areas, cytoplasm areas, edges of nuclei, and background. All connected components in the binary mask of nuclei are treated as potential nuclei. However, some objects actually are clusters of overlapping nuclei. They are detected by their outlying values of morphometric features. Then an attempt is made to separate them using the seeded watershed segmentation. If the attempt is successful, they are included in the nuclei set. The accuracy of this approach is evaluated with the help of referenced, manually segmented images. The degree of matching between reference nuclei and discovered objects is measured with the help of Jaccard distance and Hausdorff distance. As part of the study, we verified how the use of a convolutional neural network instead of the intensity thresholding to generate a topographical map for the watershed improves segmentation outcomes. Our results show that convolutional neural network outperforms Otsu thresholding and adaptive thresholding in most cases, especially in scenarios with many overlapping nuclei.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerBreast cancerConvolutional neural networksMathematical morphologyNuclei segmentationOversegmentationWatershed

Identifiers

PMID31161430
PMCPMC7064474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.