ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019
Relationship between patient-based scoring systems and the activity level of patients measured by wearable activity trackers in lumbar spine disease.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Objective Assessment of Sleep Disorders in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Using Wearable Trackers.Spine surgery and related research · 2023Article
- Measuring objective physical activity in people with chronic low back pain using accelerometers: a scoping review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Objective evaluation of postoperative changes in real-life activity levels in the postoperative course of lumbar spinal surgery using wearable trackers.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposesTo evaluate whether a relationship exists between patient-based scoring systems and the activity level of patients with low back pain (LBP) by using wearable activity trackers, and to determine whether activity level was affected by patient factors.
methodsThe subjects were 66 patients with LBP. The physical activity of participants was objectively evaluated using the Micro-Motion logger (Actigraph). The activity level was analyzed with the mean active count of the proportional-integrating mode (PMAC) and zero-crossing mode. Clinical symptoms were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index, and visual analog scale (VAS). The relationships between each item of the patient-based questionnaire and activity level, and the influence of individual factors (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], low back pain, and muscle mass) on the activity level were evaluated.
resultsIn each domain of the JOABPEQ, lumbar spine dysfunction and social life dysfunction were correlated with PMAC (r = 0.327 and 0.321, respectively). The low back pain VAS scores were correlated with PMAC (r = - 0.246). Multiple regression analysis shows that individual factors affecting the activity level of patients with LBP were sex, BMI, low back pain, and muscle mass in PMAC (p < 0.01).
conclusionsSome domains of the questionnaires were correlated with activity level, but others were not. Additionally, the activity level of patients with LBP was affected by sex, BMI, LBP, and skeletal muscle mass index. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.