Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31161021›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Contagious fear: Escape behavior increases with flock size in European gregarious birds.

Federico Morelli, Yanina Benedetti, Mario Díaz, Tomas Grim, Juan Diego Ibáñez-Álamo, Jukka Jokimäki, Marja-Liisa Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, Kunter Tätte, Gábor Markó, Yiting Jiang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. No Evidence for Contagious Yawning in Juvenile Ravens (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Federico MorelliDepartment of Applied Geoinformatics and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1099-1357
Yanina BenedettiDepartment of Applied Geoinformatics and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic.
Mario DíazDepartment of Biogeography and Global Change Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (BGC-MNCN-CSIC) Madrid Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6384-6674
Tomas GrimDepartment of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology Palacky University Olomouc Czech Republic.
Juan Diego Ibáñez-ÁlamoBehavioral and Physiological Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Jukka JokimäkiNature Inventory and EIA-services, Arctic Centre University of Lapland Rovaniemi Finland.
Marja-Liisa Kaisanlahti-JokimäkiNature Inventory and EIA-services, Arctic Centre University of Lapland Rovaniemi Finland.
Kunter TätteDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology & Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu Estonia.
Gábor MarkóEcology Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungarian Natural History Museum Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.
Yiting JiangEcologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech Université Saclay Orsay France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-0452
Piotr TryjanowskiInstitute of Zoology Poznań University of Life Sciences Poznan Poland.
Anders Pape MøllerEcologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech Université Saclay Orsay France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3739-4675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flight initiation distance (FID), the distance at which individuals take flight when approached by a potential (human) predator, is a tool for understanding predator-prey interactions. Among the factors affecting FID, tests of effects of group size (i.e., number of potential prey) on FID have yielded contrasting results. Group size or flock size could either affect FID negatively (i.e., the dilution effect caused by the presence of many individuals) or positively (i.e., increased vigilance due to more eyes scanning for predators). These effects may be associated with gregarious species, because such species should be better adapted to exploiting information from other individuals in the group than nongregarious species. Sociality may explain why earlier findings on group size versus FID have yielded different conclusions. Here, we analyzed how flock size affected bird FID in eight European countries. A phylogenetic generalized least square regression model was used to investigate changes in escape behavior of bird species in relation to number of individuals in the flock, starting distance, diet, latitude, and type of habitat. Flock size of different bird species influenced how species responded to perceived threats. We found that gregarious birds reacted to a potential predator earlier (longer FID) when aggregated in large flocks. These results support a higher vigilance arising from many eyes scanning in birds, suggesting that sociality may be a key factor in the evolution of antipredator behavior both in urban and rural areas. Finally, future studies comparing FID must pay explicit attention to the number of individuals in flocks of gregarious species.

Indexed as

birdsdilution effectfear responseFIDgregariousnesshuman disturbancesocial interactionsvigilance

Identifiers

PMID31161021
PMCPMC6540657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.