Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31160943›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2019

Integrating CRISPR-Cas9 Technology into Undergraduate Courses: Perspectives from a National Science Foundation (NSF) Workshop for Undergraduate Faculty, June 2018.

Michael J Wolyniak, Shane Austin, Lucian F Bloodworth, Dawn Carter, Scott H Harrison, Tiffany Hoage, Lisa Hollis-Brown, Felicia Jefferson, Alison Krufka, Farida Safadi-Chamberlin and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael J WolyniakDepartment of Biology, Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, VA 23943.
Shane AustinDepartment of Biological and Chemical Sciences, The University of the West Indies at Cave Hill, Bridgetown, BB11000, Barbados.
Lucian F BloodworthDepartment of Biology, Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, VA 23943.
Dawn CarterThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623.
Scott H HarrisonDepartment of Biology, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411.
Tiffany HoageDepartment of Biology, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI 54751.
Lisa Hollis-BrownDepartment of Biology, Pikes Peak Community College, Colorado Springs, CO 80906.
Felicia JeffersonDepartment of Biology, Fort Valley State University, Fort Valley, GA 31030.
Alison KrufkaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028.
Farida Safadi-ChamberlinDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Maria S SantistebanDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Pembroke, Pembroke, NC 28372.
Paula SoneralDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bethel University, St. Paul, MN 55112.
Beth VanWinkleThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623.
Anil K ChallaDepartment of Biology, The University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294.
Hampden–Sydney College · USRochester Institute of Technology · USBethel University · USColorado State University · USFort Valley State University · USNorth Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University · USPikes Peak Community College · USRowan University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of North Carolina at Pembroke · USUniversity of the West Indies · BBUniversity of Wisconsin–Stout · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas9 technology becomes more mainstream in life science research, it becomes critical for undergraduate instructors to devise engaging ways to bring the technology into their classrooms. To help meet this challenge, the National Science Foundation sponsored a workshop for undergraduate instructors in June 2018 at The Ohio State University in conjunction with the annual Association of Biology Laboratory Educators meeting based on a workflow developed by the workshop's facilitators. Over the course of two and a half days, participants worked through a modular workflow for the use of CRISPR-Cas9 in a course-based (undergraduate) research experience (CURE) setting while discussing the barriers each of their institutions had to implementing such work, and how such barriers could be overcome. The result of the workshop was a team with newfound energy and confidence to implement CRISPR-Cas9 technology in their courses and the development of a community of undergraduate educators dedicated to supporting each other in the implementation of the workflow either in a CURE or modular format. In this article, we review the activities and discussions from the workshop that helped each participant devise their own tailored approaches of how best to bring this exciting new technology into their classes.

Identifiers

PMID31160943
PMCPMC6508915
OpenAlexW2945902932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.