Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31160917›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2019

Prevalence of back pain in employees of a German chemical company: results of a large cross-sectional study.

Matthias Claus, Michael Schuster, Stefan Webendörfer, David A Groneberg, Jacqueline Jähner, Daniel Schiffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A kinematic posture analysis of neurological assistants in their daily working practice-a pilot study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthias Claus1Corporate Health Management, FEH/CS - H308, BASF SE, 67056 Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Michael Schuster1Corporate Health Management, FEH/CS - H308, BASF SE, 67056 Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Stefan Webendörfer1Corporate Health Management, FEH/CS - H308, BASF SE, 67056 Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
David A Groneberg2Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jacqueline Jähner2Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Daniel Schiffmann1Corporate Health Management, FEH/CS - H308, BASF SE, 67056 Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the current study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of back pain in employees of a German chemical company. We put a specific focus on disabling back pain and its association with sociodemographic, lifestyle- and work-related characteristics.

methodsWe used cross-sectional data, surveyed in health check-ups between 2011 and 2014 in Ludwigshafen am Rhein (Germany). A blood sample, physical examination and anamnesis by an occupational health physician as well as a written questionnaire were part of the check-up. A modified version of the

resultsOverall, 17,351 employees participated in the health check-up, information on 16,792 persons could be used for analyses. Participants were on average 43.7 (SD: 9.7) years old and mainly male (79.1%). Lifetime-, 12-months-, and 7-days-prevalence of any type and duration of back pain were 72.5, 66.1, and 27.1% respectively. About one third (33.5%) had suffered from an episode of disabling back pain, 16.7% 1-7 days, 10.3% 8-30 days, and 6.5% more than 30 days. Multinomial regression analysis yielded that 8-30 days or more than 30 days of disabling back pain (relative to 0 days) were more likely with older age, female gender, being married, former or current smoking, lower occupational status, higher work-related stress score, history of a spinal injury, and diagnosed dorsopathy.

conclusionsThere is a great need for action regarding multifaceted preventive measures and early interventions, especially for manual workers, older employees and women, where occupational medicine can play a decisive role.

Indexed as

Back painChemical companyCross-sectional studyDisabling back painGermanyMultinomial logistic regressionOccupational medicinePrevalencePrevention

Identifiers

PMID31160917
PMCPMC6540530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.