Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31160683›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Transferability of PCR-based diagnostic protocols: An international collaborative case study assessing protocols targeting the quarantine pine pathogen Fusarium circinatum.

Renaud Ioos, Francesco Aloi, Barbara Piškur, Cécile Guinet, Martin Mullett, Mónica Berbegal, Helena Bragança, Santa Olga Cacciola, Funda Oskay, Carolina Cornejo and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Test Performance Study on qPCR Assays for Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Co-Infections byPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 20 institutions in 16 countries.

Renaud IoosANSES Laboratoire de la Santé des Végétaux, Unité de Mycologie, Domaine de Pixérécourt Bât. E, 54220, Malzéville, France. renaud.ioos@anses.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-5098
Francesco AloiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 100, Catania, 95123, Italy.
Barbara PiškurSlovenian Forestry Institute, Department of Forest Protection, Večna pot 2, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Cécile GuinetANSES Laboratoire de la Santé des Végétaux, Unité de Mycologie, Domaine de Pixérécourt Bât. E, 54220, Malzéville, France.
Martin MullettForest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 4LH, United Kingdom.
Mónica BerbegalInstituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Helena BragançaInstituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária I.P. (INIAV I.P.), Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159, Oeiras, Portugal.
Santa Olga CacciolaDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 100, Catania, 95123, Italy.
Funda OskayÇankırı Karatekin University, Faculty of Forestry, 18200, Çankırı, Turkey.
Carolina CornejoSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Zuercherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Kalev AdamsonInstitute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006, Tartu, Estonia.
Clovis Douanla-MeliJulius Kühn-Institut, Institute for National and International Plant Health, Messeweg 11-12, 38104, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7182-5905
Audrius KačergiusLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Vokė Branch, Zalioji Sq. 2, 02232, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Pablo Martínez-ÁlvarezSustainable Forest Management Research Institute, University of Valladolid - INIA/Department of Vegetal Production and Forest Resources, University of Valladolid, 47011, Palencia, Spain.
Justyna Anna NowakowskaCardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Wóycickiego 1/3 Street, 01-938, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5863-053X
Nicola LuchiInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection - National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, I-50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
Anna Maria VettrainoDepartment for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, via S. Camillo de Lellis, snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0797-3297
Rodrigo AhumadaBioforest S.A. Camino a Coronel km 15S/N, 4030000, Concepción, Chile.
Matias PasqualiDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, via Celoria 2, I-20133, Milano, Italy.
Gerda FourieDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, 0028 Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa.
Loukas KanetisDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology, and Food Science, Cyprus University of Technology, 3036, Limassol, Cyprus.
Artur AlvesDepartamento de Biologia, CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0117-2958
Luisa GhelardiniDipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Agroalimentari e dell'Ambiente (DISPAA), University of Florence, 50144, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3180-4226
Miloň DvořákPhytophthora Research Center, Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Antonio Sanz-RosForest Health Center of Calabazanos, Regional Government of Castilla y León, JCyL, Poligono Industrial de Villamuriel, S/N, 30190, Villamuriel de Cerrato, Palencia, Spain.
Julio J DiezSustainable Forest Management Research Institute, University of Valladolid - INIA/Department of Vegetal Production and Forest Resources, University of Valladolid, 47011, Palencia, Spain.
Jeyaseelan BaskarathevanPlant Health & Environment Laboratory, Diagnostic and Surveillance Services, Biosecurity New Zealand, Ministry for Primary Industries, PO Box 2095, Auckland, 1140, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5389-2570
Jaime AguayoANSES Laboratoire de la Santé des Végétaux, Unité de Mycologie, Domaine de Pixérécourt Bât. E, 54220, Malzéville, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7552-0655
Universidad de Valladolid · ESUniversity of Catania · ITÇankırı Karatekin University · TRCardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw · PLCyprus University of Technology · CYEstonian University of Life Sciences · EEForest Research · GBInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection · ITInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MAInstituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária · PTJulius Kühn-Institut · DELithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry · LTMendel University in Brno · CZMinistry for Primary Industries · NZSlovenian Forestry Institute · SISwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research · CHUniversità degli Studi della Tuscia · ITUniversitat Politècnica de València · ESUniversity of Aveiro · PTUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusarium circinatum is a harmful pathogenic fungus mostly attacking Pinus species and also Pseudotsuga menziesii, causing cankers in trees of all ages, damping-off in seedlings, and mortality in cuttings and mother plants for clonal production. This fungus is listed as a quarantine pest in several parts of the world and the trade of potentially contaminated pine material such as cuttings, seedlings or seeds is restricted in order to prevent its spread to disease-free areas. Inspection of plant material often relies on DNA testing and several conventional or real-time PCR based tests targeting F. circinatum are available in the literature. In this work, an international collaborative study joined 23 partners to assess the transferability and the performance of nine molecular protocols, using a wide panel of DNA from 71 representative strains of F. circinatum and related Fusarium species. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the nine protocols all reached values >80%, and the diagnostic specificity was the only parameter differing significantly between protocols. The rates of false positives and of false negatives were computed and only the false positive rates differed significantly, ranging from 3.0% to 17.3%. The difference between protocols for some of the performance values were mainly due to cross-reactions with DNA from non-target species, which were either not tested or documented in the original articles. Considering that participating laboratories were free to use their own reagents and equipment, this study demonstrated that the diagnostic protocols for F. circinatum were not easily transferable to end-users. More generally, our results suggest that the use of protocols using conventional or real-time PCR outside their initial development and validation conditions should require careful characterization of the performance data prior to use under modified conditions (i.e. reagents and equipment). Suggestions to improve the transfer are proposed.

Indexed as

DNA, FungalDNA, PlantFalse Positive ReactionsFusariumInternational CooperationMolecular BiologyPinusPlant DiseasesPolymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, FungalDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID31160683
PMCPMC6546748
OpenAlexW2948705462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.