Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31160682›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Genome-Wide DNA from Degraded Petrous Bones and the Assessment of Sex and Probable Geographic Origins of Forensic Cases.

Daniel Gaudio, Daniel M Fernandes, Ryan Schmidt, Olivia Cheronet, Debora Mazzarelli, Mirko Mattia, Tadhg O'Keeffe, Robin N M Feeney, Cristina Cattaneo, Ron Pinhasi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Record-matching of STR profiles with fragmentary genomic SNP data.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A novel method of male sex identification of human ancient skeletal remains.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniel GaudioSchool of Archaeology and Earth Institute, University College of Dublin, Dublin 4, Belfield, Ireland. daniel.gaudio79@gmail.com.
Daniel M FernandesSchool of Archaeology and Earth Institute, University College of Dublin, Dublin 4, Belfield, Ireland.
Ryan SchmidtSchool of Archaeology and Earth Institute, University College of Dublin, Dublin 4, Belfield, Ireland.
Olivia CheronetSchool of Archaeology and Earth Institute, University College of Dublin, Dublin 4, Belfield, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6760-1204
Debora MazzarelliLabAnOF, Sezione di Medicina Legale, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 37, 20133, Milano, Italy.
Mirko MattiaLabAnOF, Sezione di Medicina Legale, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 37, 20133, Milano, Italy.
Tadhg O'KeeffeSchool of Archaeology and Earth Institute, University College of Dublin, Dublin 4, Belfield, Ireland.
Robin N M FeeneySchool of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Belfield, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4608-3852
Cristina CattaneoLabAnOF, Sezione di Medicina Legale, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 37, 20133, Milano, Italy.
Ron PinhasiDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14 1090, Wien, Austria. ron.pinhasi@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1629-8131
University College Dublin · IEUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acquisition of biological information and assessment of the most probable geographic origin of unidentified individuals for obtaining positive identification is central in forensic sciences. Identification based on forensic DNA, however, varies greatly in relation to degradation of DNA. Our primary aim is to assess the applicability of a petrous bone sampling method in combination with Next Generation Sequencing to evaluate the quality and quantity of DNA in taphonomically degraded petrous bones from forensic and cemetery cases. A related aim is to analyse the genomic data to obtain the molecular sex of each individual, and their most probable geographic origin. Six of seven subjects were previously identified and used for comparison with the results. To analyse their probable geographic origin, samples were genotyped for the 627.719 SNP positions. Results show that the inner ear cochlear region of the petrous bone provides good percentages of endogenous DNA (14.61-66.89%), even in the case of burnt bodies. All comparisons between forensic records and genetic results agree (sex) and are compatible (geographic origin). The application of the proposed methodology may be a powerful tool for use in forensic scenarios, ranging from missing persons to unidentified migrants who perish when crossing borders.

Indexed as

Forensic GeneticsGenome, HumanGeographyDNAFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMalePetrous BonePrincipal Component AnalysisSkullTemperatureDNA

Identifiers

PMID31160682
PMCPMC6547751
OpenAlexW2948759395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.