ArticleScientific reports2019
Opposing effects of acute versus chronic inhibition of p53 on decitabine's efficacy in myeloid neoplasms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Modeling and therapeutic targeting of t(8;21) AML with/without TP53 deficiency.International journal of hematology · 2024Article
- IMPDH inhibition activates TLR-VCAM1 pathway and suppresses the development of MLL-fusion leukemia.EMBO molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Selinexor synergizes with azacitidine to eliminate myelodysplastic syndrome cells through p53 nuclear accumulation.Investigational new drugs · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decitabine is a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor and is considered a promising drug to treat myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with p53 mutations. However, whether loss of p53 in fact increases the response of MDS/AML cells to decitabine remains unclear. In this study, we assessed the role of p53 in MDS and AML cells treated with decitabine using mouse models for MLL-AF9-driven AML and mutant ASXL1-driven MDS/AML. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated depletion of p53 in MDS/AML cells did not increase, but rather decreased their sensitivity to decitabine. Forced expression of a dominant-negative p53 fragment (p53DD) in these cells also decreased their responses to decitabine, confirming that acute inhibition of p53 conferred resistance to decitabine in AML and MDS/AML cells. In contrast, MLL-AF9-expressing AML cells generated from bone marrow progenitors of Trp53-deficient mice were more sensitive to decitabine in vivo than their wild-type counterparts, suggesting that long-term chronic p53 deficiency increases decitabine sensitivity in AML cells. Taken together, these data revealed a multifaceted role for p53 to regulate responses of myeloid neoplasms to decitabine treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.