Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31160370›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2019

Setting goals with patients living with multimorbidity: qualitative analysis of general practice consultations.

Charlotte Salter, Alice Shiner, Elizabeth Lenaghan, Jamie Murdoch, John A Ford, Sandra Winterburn, Nick Steel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charlotte SalterNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Alice ShinerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Elizabeth LenaghanNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Jamie MurdochNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
John A FordNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Sandra WinterburnNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Nick SteelNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0215-36079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstablishing patient goals is widely recommended as a way to deliver care that matters to the individual patient with multimorbidity, who may not be well served by single-disease guidelines. Though multimorbidity is now normal in general practice, little is known about how doctors and patients should set goals together.

aimTo determine the key components of the goal-setting process in general practice. DESIGN AND

settingIn-depth qualitative analysis of goal-setting consultations in three UK general practices, as part of a larger feasibility trial. Focus groups with participating GPs and patients. The study took place between November 2016 and July 2018.

methodActivity analysis was applied to 10 hours of video-recorded doctor-patient interactions to explore key themes relating to how goal setting was attempted and achieved. Core challenges were identified and focus groups were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsA total of 22 patients and five GPs participated. Four main themes emerged around the goal-setting process: patient preparedness and engagement; eliciting and legitimising goals; collaborative action planning; and GP engagement. GPs were unanimously positive about their experience of goal setting and viewed it as a collaborative process. Patients liked having time to talk about what was most important to them. Challenges included eliciting goals from unprepared patients, and GPs taking control of the goal rather than working through it with the patient.

conclusionGoal setting required time and energy from both parties. GPs had an important role in listening and bearing witness to their patients' goals. Goal setting worked best when both GP and patient were prepared in advance.

Indexed as

General PracticeGoalsMultimorbidityPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePatient Care PlanningPatient-Centered CareQualitative Researchdoctor–patient communicationgoalsgoal settingmultimorbiditypatient care planningpatient-centred careprimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID31160370
PMCPMC6592350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.