Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31160351›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2019

Beyond DNA and RNA: The Expanding Toolbox of Synthetic Genetics.

Alexander I Taylor, Gillian Houlihan, Philipp Holliger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Reconstituting alternative life using the test-bed of cell-free systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. The XNA alphabet.Nucleic acids research · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Rapid Chemical Ligation of DNA andJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Thermophilic Nucleic Acid Polymerases and Their Application in Xenobiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander I TaylorMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, United Kingdom.
Gillian HoulihanMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, United Kingdom.
Philipp HolligerMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105178804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The remarkable physicochemical properties of the natural nucleic acids, DNA and RNA, define modern biology at the molecular level and are widely believed to have been central to life's origins. However, their ability to form repositories of information as well as functional structures such as ligands (aptamers) and catalysts (ribozymes/DNAzymes) is not unique. A range of nonnatural alternatives, collectively termed xeno nucleic acids (XNAs), are also capable of supporting genetic information storage and propagation as well as evolution. This gives rise to a new field of "synthetic genetics," which seeks to expand the nucleic acid chemical toolbox for applications in both biotechnology and molecular medicine. In this review, we outline XNA polymerase and reverse transcriptase engineering as a key enabling technology and summarize the application of "synthetic genetics" to the development of aptamers, enzymes, and nanostructures.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRNARNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRNARNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID31160351
PMCPMC6546049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.