Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31160249›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2019

Cediranib in patients with alveolar soft-part sarcoma (CASPS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial.

Ian Judson, James P Morden, Lucy Kilburn, Michael Leahy, Charlotte Benson, Vivek Bhadri, Quentin Campbell-Hewson, Ricardo Cubedo, Adam Dangoor, Lisa Fox and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01337401 (A Phase II Trial of Cediranib in the Treatment of Patients With Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01337401 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase II Trial of Cediranib in the Treatment of Patients With Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma (CASPS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute of Cancer Research, United KingdomRan2011 to 2020Enrolled36ConditionsAlveolar Soft-part SarcomaArmsCediranib, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Phase II Study of TQB2450, a Novel PD-L1 Antibody, in Combination with Anlotinib in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. How I treat soft tissue sarcomas.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Role of Adenosine in Overcoming Resistance in Sarcomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

Ian JudsonThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: Ian.Judson@icr.ac.uk.
James P MordenClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Lucy KilburnClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Michael LeahyThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Charlotte BensonThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Vivek BhadriChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Quentin Campbell-HewsonNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ricardo CubedoHospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Adam DangoorUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Lisa FoxClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Ivo HennigNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Katy JarmanClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Warren JoubertPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sarah KernaghanClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Antonio López PousaHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Catriona McNeilChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Beatrice SeddonUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Claire SnowdonClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Martin TattersallChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Christy TomsClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Javier Martinez TruferoHospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Judith M BlissClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBChris O’Brien Lifehouse · AURoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare soft-tissue sarcoma that is unresponsive to chemotherapy. Cediranib, a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, has shown substantial activity in ASPS in non-randomised studies. The Cediranib in Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma (CASPS) study was designed to discriminate the effect of cediranib from the intrinsically indolent nature of ASPS.

methodsIn this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial, we recruited participants from 12 hospitals in the UK (n=7), Spain (n=3), and Australia (n=2). Patients were eligible if they were aged 16 years or older; metastatic ASPS that had progressed in the previous 6 months; had an ECOG performance status of 0-1; life expectancy of more than 12 weeks; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. Participants had to have no anti-cancer treatment within 4 weeks before trial entry, with exception of palliative radiotherapy. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1), with allocation by use of computer-generated random permuted blocks of six, to either cediranib (30 mg orally, once daily) or matching placebo tablets for 24 weeks. Treatment was supplied in number-coded bottles, masking participants and clinicians to assignment. Participants were unblinded at week 24 or sooner if they had progression defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1); those on placebo crossed over to cediranib and all participants continued on treatment until progression or death. The primary endpoint was percentage change in sum of target marker lesion diameters between baseline and week 24 or progression if sooner, assessed in the evaluable population (all randomly assigned participants who had a scan at week 24 [or sooner if they progressed] with target marker lesions measured). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01337401; the European Clinical Trials database, number EudraCT2010-021163-33; and the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN63733470 recruitment is complete and follow-up is ongoing.

findingsBetween July 15, 2011, and July 29, 2016, of 48 participants recruited, all were randomly assigned to cediranib (n=32) or placebo (n=16). 23 (48%) were female and the median age was 31 years (IQR 27-45). Median follow-up was 34·3 months (IQR 23·7-55·6) at the time of data cutoff for these analyses (April 11, 2018). Four participants in the cediranib group were not evaluable for the primary endpoint (one did not start treatment, and three did not have their scan at 24 weeks). Median percentage change in sum of target marker lesion diameters for the evaluable population was -8·3% (IQR -26·5 to 5·9) with cediranib versus 13·4% (IQR 1·1 to 21·3) with placebo (one-sided p=0·0010). The most common grade 3 adverse events on (blinded) cediranib were hypertension (six [19%] of 31) and diarrhoea (two [6%]). 15 serious adverse reactions in 12 patients were reported; 12 of these reactions occurred on open-label cediranib, and the most common symptoms were dehydration (n=2), vomiting (n=2), and proteinuria (n=2). One probable treatment-related death (intracranial haemorrhage) occurred 41 days after starting open-label cediranib in a patient who was assigned to placebo in the masked phase.

interpretationGiven the high incidence of metastatic disease and poor long-term prognosis of ASPS, together with the lack of efficacy of conventional chemotherapy, our finding of significant clinical activity with cediranib in this disease is an important step towards the goal of long-term disease control for these young patients. Future clinical trials in ASPS are also likely to involve immune checkpoint inhibitors.

fundingCancer Research UK and AstraZeneca.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndolesMaleMiddle AgedQuinazolinesSarcoma, Alveolar Soft PartSoft Tissue NeoplasmsYoung AdultAntineoplastic AgentscediranibIndolesQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID31160249
PMCPMC6602919
OpenAlexW2947734585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.